Compare Documents
This page compares two reports at the document level. The column on the left shows the first report and the column in the middle shows the second. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two documents. Pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage shows the percentage of similarity between the two documents.
The Argus - Friday, May 3, 1895
The trial of Oscar Wilde, the well-known author and dramatist, and the man Taylor, was concluded at the Old Bailey to-day.
Mr. Justice Charles, in his summing up to the jury, was on the whole favourable to the prisoners. He dwelt emphatically on the fact that several of the witnesses for the prosecution were undoubted blackmailers.
The jury, after being locked up for some time, came into court and announced that they were unable to agree on a verdict. They were accordingly discharged.
The accused were remanded in custody, an application for bail being refused by the judge. They are to be tried again.
The Bay of Plenty Times - Friday, May 3, 1895
London, May 1.—Taylor swears that he is absolutely innocent of the charge brought against him.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., Counsel for the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury in which he claimed an acquittal on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation.
The jury in Wilde and Taylor's case disagreed and were discharged, bail was however refused the accused.
London, May 2.—The summing up of Mr Justice Charles was in favour of the prisoners Wilde and Taylor and His Honour emphasised the fact that several of the witnesses for the prosecution were undoubted blackmailers.