The Australasian - Saturday, May 4, 1895

The trial of Oscar Wilde, upon charges arising out of the recent Queensberry libel action, is proceeding at the Old Bailey.

The charge of conspiracy against Wilde and the man Taylor has been withdrawn, but the charge of misdemeanour against Wilde is being proceeded with.

Oscar Wilde, who volunteered to give evidence on his own behalf, went into the witness-box and denied all the charges. He alleges that he is innocent and has been made the victim of a system of blackmail

Taylor also went into the witness-box, and swore that he was absolutely innocent of the charges brought against him.

Sir Edward Clarke, Q,C., addressed the Court on behalf of the accused in an eloquent speech, claiming the acquittal of his clients on the ground that the chief witnesses for the Crown were of bad character and altogether untrustworthy.

Mr. Justice Charles, in summing up on May 1, was on the whole favourable to the prisoners. He dwelt emphatically on the fact that several of the witnesses for the prosecution were undoubted blackmailers.

The jury, after being locked up for some time, came into court and announced that they were unable to agree on a verdict. They were accordingly discharged.

The accused were remanded in custody, an application for bail being refused by the judge. They are to be tried again.

The Sydney Morning Herald - Thursday, May 2, 1895

LONDON, April 30.

The trial of Oscar Wilde and Taylor, his associate, was continued at the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, to-day.

At the close of the evidence for the prosecution counsel for the Crown withdrew the charges of conspiracy. The charge on which the accused are being tried is that of misdemeanour.

The case for the defence was then entered upon. Oscar Wilde went into the witness-box and emphatically denied all the charges against him, alleging that he was the victim of blackmail.

The case is not yet concluded.

LATER.

Taylor was placed in the witness-box to-day. He swore that he was absolutely innocent of the crimes imputed to him.

Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C. M.P., made an eloquent speech for the defence. He reviewed the evidence, and claimed an acquittal on the ground that the chief witnesses for the Crown were tainted.

The Judge will sum up the case tomorrow.

Highlighted DifferencesNot significantly similar