Compare Documents
This page compares two reports at the document level. The column on the left shows the first report and the column in the middle shows the second. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two documents. Pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage shows the percentage of similarity between the two documents.
The Adelaide Observer - Saturday, May 25, 1895
The trial of Oscar Wilde, who is charged with committing similar offences to those for which Alfred Taylor has been convicted, is proceeding before His Honor Sir Alfred Mills on the criminal side of the Court of Queen's Bench.
London, May 23.
The case against Oscar Wilde has been adjourned.
The charge against him with reference to Shelley has been withdrawn on the ground that there is no corroborative evidence.
Evening Post - Saturday, May 25, 1895
London, 24th May.
Oscar Wilde's case has been adjourned.
The charge against him in conjunction has been withdrawn, as there is no corroborative evidence.
[Special.](Received May 25, 8 a.m.)
London, 24th May.
At the trial of Oscar Wilde, the Judge said he was of opinion that Shelley suffered from delusions, and that there was nothing unnatural in his friendship with accused. The evidence did not prove otherwise than that the friendship was perfectly honourable.
In his evidence Wilde denied in toto all the charges made against him.