Compare Documents
This page compares two reports at the document level. The column on the left shows the first report and the column in the middle shows the second. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two documents. Pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage shows the percentage of similarity between the two documents.
The Daily Telegraph - Saturday, May 25, 1895
LONDON. Thursday, 1 p.m.— The evidence which is being given at the trial of Oscar Wilde is identical with that given previously, and has not been shaken in any respect.
(This message appeared in a second edition yesterday.)
LONDON. Thursday Night.—At the trial of Oscar Wilde at the Central Criminal Court to-day Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., M.P., who appears for the accused, asked Mr. Justice Wills not to send the case arising out of an incident at the Savoy Hotel to the jury.
Mr. Justice Wills said that a sense of duty prevented him from withdrawing that particular charge. He, however, dismissed the count which charged Wilde with indecency with Edward Shelley, a publisher's assistant, on the ground that the evidence lacked support, and that Shelley was subject to delusions. The judge said the evidence showed that nothing but an unnatural friendship existed, and it had not been proved that this friendship was otherwise than perfectly honorable.
Sydney Evening News - Friday, May 24, 1895
London, May 23.-- The trial of Oscar Wilde was continued at the Central Criminal Court to-day.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., M.P., who appeared for the defence, asked Mr. Justice Wills not to send the case arising out of the incident at the Savoy Hotel to the jurv.
Mr. Justice Wills said a sense of duty prevented him from withdrawing it. He, however, dismissed the count charging indecency between Wilde and Shelley on the ground that tho evidence lacked support, and that Shelley suffered from delusions. The evidence showed nothing but an unnatural friendship, and it had not been proved that it was otherwise than perfectly honorable.
The case referring to Shelley was afterwards withdrawn.
The case had not concluded when the court rose.