Compare Documents
This page compares two reports at the document level. The column on the left shows the first report and the column in the middle shows the second. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two documents. Pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage shows the percentage of similarity between the two documents.
The Queenslander - Saturday, May 11, 1895
The case against Oscar Wilde and Taylor was resumed this morning, the address of the counsel for the accused having been concluded yesterday.
The presiding Judge, Sir Arthur Charles, summed up in favour of the accused, and laid emphasis on the fact that several of the witnesses for the prosecution were undoubted blackmailers.
After deliberating for some time the jury announced that they were unable to agree, and they were thereupon discharged.
The accused will be re-tried, and meantime they were remanded to gaol, bail being refused.
New Zealand Mail - Friday, May 10, 1895
London, May 1.
The jury in Wilde and Taylor's case disagreed, and were discharged. Bail was refused the accused.
London, May 1.
The summoning of the Judge, Sir Arthur Charles, was in favour of the prisoners Wilde and Taylor, and His Honor emphasised the fact that several of the witnesses for the prosecution were undoubted blackmailers.
London, May 2.
Wilde's case is to be tried again on the 20th inst.
London, May 4.
Oscar Wilde has been admitted to bail—himself in £2500 and two sureties of £1250 each.