Compare Documents
This page compares two reports at the document level. The column on the left shows the first report and the column in the middle shows the second. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two documents. Pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage shows the percentage of similarity between the two documents.
The South Australian Register - Wednesday, May 1, 1895
The trial of Oscar Wilde and his accomplice Taylor, who were charged with conspiring together to commit a crime, and also each separately with having committed a misdemeanour, was resumed to-day.
Counsel for the Crown decided to withdraw the charge of conspiracy, and the trial is now proceeding on the misdemeanor charge.
After the Crown had submitted their evidence, Oscar Wilde entered the witness box to give evidence on his own behalf. He denied the testimony of the witnesses for the Crown in toto, and alleged that he was the victim of a parcel of blackmailers.
The Adelaide Observer - Saturday, May 4, 1895
The Grand Jury having found a true bill against Oscar Wilde and his confederate Taylor, they were arraigned to-day at the Old Bailey.
Both defendants pleaded not guilty, and the trial is now proceeding.
London, April 30.
The trial of Oscar Wilde and his accomplice Taylor, who were charged with conspiring together to commit a crime, and also each separately with having committed a misdemeanour, was resumed to-day.
Counsel for the Crown decided to withdraw the charge of conspiracy, and the trial is now proceeding on the misdemeanor charge.
After the Crown had submitted their evidence, Oscar Wilde entered the witness box to give evidence on his own behalf. He denied the testimony of the witnesses for the Crown in toto, and alleged that he was the victim of a parcel of blackmailers.