Compare Documents
This page compares two reports at the document level. The column on the left shows the first report and the column in the middle shows the second. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two documents. Pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage shows the percentage of similarity between the two documents.
The South Australian Register - Thursday, May 23, 1895
The trial of Alfred Taylor, who was alleged to have been an accomplice with Oscar Wilde in certain offences against the eleventh section of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, was continued to-day in the Court of Queen's Bench, before His Honor Sir Alfred Mills, one of the Justices of the Queen's Bench.
The Court was crowded throughout the trial, and at the conclusion of the address of counsel the Judge's summing up was listened to with unconcealed interest.
The Jury brought in a verdict of guilty on two counts in connection with Charles William Parker, a witness for Oscar Wilde in the libel action brought against the Marquis of Queensberry.
Sir Alfred Mills deferred passing sentence against the prisoner until the conclusion of the trial now proceeding against Oscar Wilde, the well-known dramatist and litterateur, on similar charges.
The Adelaide Observer - Saturday, May 25, 1895
Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor, who were arraigned last month before Sir Arthur Charles for offences under the eleventh clause of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, will again appear in the Court of Queen's Bench on Monday, when His Honor Sir Alfred Wills, one of the Justices of the Queen's Bench, will take the case.
London, May 20.
The trial of Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor for offences under the eleventh clause of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act was begun to-day before His Honor Sir Alfred Wills in the Court of Queen's Bench.
The prisoners are being tried on separate indictments.