Compare Documents

Mr. C. F. Gill Makes a Relentless Opening Speech, and Some Painful Evidence is Given.

There was a big crowd outside Bow-st. half an hour before the doors opened, but most of them had to be content without admittance. Mr. Gill drove up shortly before the doors were opened, and his presence was an indication that the prosecution will not be a half-hearted one. There was a great muster of Pressmen in the lower court, but after waiting half an hour there came the sudden news that the case would be taken in the court upstairs. At once the Pressmen "folded their tents, like the Arabs, and silently stole away -- every man of them--upstairs and along the passage till entrance was gained. The little court was soon so crowded that the ushers began to bring in chairs to accommodate the latest comers. Then after half an hour's wait Mr. Gill, who had met Oscar at Scotland-yard the night before, came into court with Mr. Angus Lewis, the solicitor to the Treasury. In a few minutes the drama was represented by Sir Augustus Harris. Sir John Bridge took his seat and almost immediately Oscar, heavy and flushed,

ENTERED THE DOCK.

He stared round uneasily, and tidgeted incessantly, stroking his face with his brown suède glove. After a whispered inquiry of the constable standing by him, he sat down in the dock and with one arm outstreched along the back rail and the other elbow resting on the end rail took what ease he might.

Mr. Gill explained that the charge at present to be dealt with were those of acts of indecency at the Savoy Hotel in March 1893. In the upper part of the house in Litlle College-st there lived Taylor, a man closely identified with Wilde. Wilde would afterwards be charged with conspiring with Taylor. Parker was a valet out of place, who was in company with his brother, a groom, when in the St. James's Restaurant, they were accosted by Taylor, who

OFFERED THEM DRINK,

took from them their address, and invited them to Little College-st. On a subsequent day Alfred Parker drove with Wilde to the Savoy Hotel--somewhere about the 13 or 14 March. Mr. Gill traced the loathsome story which the prosecution desire to prove. Dealing with the evidence of identification, Mr. Gill remarked that he was a man whom no one who once saw him would be likely to forget--as satisfaction that the artist in Oscar will regard as supporting his claim to be "unique." Parker was leading a respectable life now, and it was painful that his story must be given. It would be corroborated in every step by his brother and by other witnesses, and as the prisoner was an available witness he would have an opportunity, if he chose, of repassing the evidence that he had given elsewhere. Mr. Gill relentless story went on to deal with the other case in which it would be shown that the prisoner had the audacity to commit these offences at the Savoy Hotel, at a hotel in Picadilly, and even at his own house in Tite-st., when all his family were away.

Charles Parker, aged 19, whose present address and occupation are not yet disclosed, told the story of his meeting Taylor at the St. James's Restaurant.

The evidence was interrupted by the news that Alfred

TAYLOR HAD BEEN ARRESTED.

Mr. Gill suggested that the case should be delayed in order that he might be put in the dock with Oscar, and Sir John Bridge accepted.

Then Mr. Humphreys, prisoner's solicitor, asked how long the magistrate thought it probable he would sit to-day.

Sir John Bridge said it was a case that ought to be disposed of as speedily as possible, and he would sit if necessary till four or five o'clock.

When Taylor arrived he came into the dock with a very polite bow to Oscar, which his fellow prisoner returned. Taylor wore a brown cloth overcoat of the latest sporting cut, with a brown velvet collar. He is clean-shaven, both on face and lip, giving him somewhat the appearance of a barrister. He took matter very coolly and a cynical smile hovered round his thin lips all the morning. He stood up in the dock leaning easily on the rail, while Oscar sat, alternately resting his chin and his forehead on his hands clasped in front of him on the rail.

Parker proceeded then with his tale of the rooms at 13, Little College-st. The drawing-room was well furnished--

"SWELLING ROOMS,"

the ex-valet phrased it at first--and he saw no servants. On the night when he first saw Wilde, he and his brother William met Taylor at the St. James's bar and went together to Kettner's, where in a private room, there was a table laid for dinner for four. It was a good dinner--"very good," witness said, with champagne, and it ended with coffee and brandy. Wilde wrote a cheque for the dinner, and then the two drove to the Savoy Hotel. As the witness related the incidents of his stay there Oscar sighed deeply several times. Wilde had rooms in St. James's place to which witness went "very often." They went together to the Crystal Palace, and they occupied one night a box at the Pavilion. After the performance they went to the rooms in St. James's place. Wilde afterwards drove him to Park walk, Chelsea, where witness had one room at No. 50, and having set him down drove home to Tite-st. On one night Wilde drove down to No.50 to see witness, and kept his cab waiting outside. There was a little unpleasantness with the landlady about the visit, and witness left the lodgings and went to Camera-sq. Chelsea. He had called on Wilde at the Albemarle Hotel, Piccadilly, being taken there by someone whose name was not mentioned. Apparently it was not Taylor. The

LAST TIME HE SAW WILDE

before this case was eight or nine months ago, when in Trafalgar-sq. Wilde was in a hansom. He stopped, shook hands and said witness was "looking as pretty as ever," and then drove off. Taylor, after he left Little College-st went to live at 3, Chapel-st, Chelsea, which was close to Park-walk. Witness had visited him there with his brother last year. Witness was with Taylor arrested in the Fitzroy-sq. case last year, and since that incident witness had given up all such companionship. He had seen Atkins at Taylor's rooms. Witness was in the country when he was found by Mr. Chas. Russell and subpoenaed.

Mr. Travers Humphreys, who had arrived since the opening and was now instructed by Mr. Wilde's solicitor, stated that he was taken by surprise by the evidence, and gained the magistrate's permission to,

POSTPONE HIS CROSS-EXAMINATION.

Taylor, who was undefended, also reserved any questions.

Sir John Bridge adjourned the court for half-an-hour, and returned precisely an hour afterwards, looking as punctual as a policeman.

William Parker, brother of the last witness, a groom, gave evidence of the meeting with Taylor.

The case is proceeding.

Sir Edward Clarke.

The Exchange Telegraph Company states on reliable authority that Sir E. Clarke may possibly defend Mr. O. Wilde.

How He Was Arrested.

The arrest-announced last night in a late edition of The Star--was quietly accomplished at the Cadogan Hotel, Sloane-st, whither private detectives employed by Lord Queensberry had tracked him after the sensational end of the Old Bailey trial.

There were happenings of some importance before the arrest. Friends drew money from Oscar's bank, and Inspector Riches and Sergeant Allen arrived from Scotland-yard. Ten minutes afterwards they reappeared; this time Oscar Wilde was their prisoner. No one in the street know what had happened. Oscar had a cigarette between his lips, and he puffed at it nervously as he stopped into a four-wheeler that had been called to the door. He looked neither to the right nor to the left. His face had

A HAGGARD LOOK,

and there was a dull red flush on his cheeks. Quickly the cab drove off, and a good pace was kept up till Scotland-yard was reached.

It is said that when Inspector Riches inquired at the hotel for Mr. Wilde he was told he was not there. This was to ward off what was thought to be an unnecessary intrusion. The inspector, however, insisted. He explained that he was a police officer, and that it would be dangerous to trifle with him. When the inspector stated the object of his visit Mr. Wilde made no reply. When the police and their prisoner alighted at New Scotland-yard Mr. Wilde made an earnest attempt to pay the cabman, but Inspector Riches would not permit it. Nevertheless he pressed some silver into the driver's hand. Mr. Wilde, whose bearing towards the officers of the law was thoroughly respectful asked what the dates in the charge were, and these dates were given. Mr. Wilde made no reply.

A Night in the Cell.

In the dock at Bow-st, where Inspector Digby took the charge, he stood with his hands in his trousers pockets, and leaned with an air of assumed indifference, but it was easy to see that Wilde who had complained of being unnerved by the stinging questions of the relentless Irish Q. C., was now

MORE UNNERVED THAN EVER

by the gravity of the position in which he found himself. One of the friends who was with Wilde at the time of the arrest drove up to Bow-st. shortly after Oscar had been taken to the cells, and wished to leave a portmanteau for him with a change of clothing. This being, in the discretion of the police, an irregular proceeding was not permitted. Soon after Lord Alfred Douglas arrived with an offer of bail. This was refused, much to his astonishment, though he was allowed to have an interview with his friend. He was much distressed at being unable to provide such comfort as he desired Oscar to have in the cells, and also at being unable to obtain his release for the night.

Lord Queensberry's Threat.

The Marquis of Queensberry wishes to correct the statement that has been published with regard to his message to Oscar Wilde. Some of the morning papers stated to-day (that as soon as the trial ended Lord Queensberry sent the following message to Mr. Wilde. -- "If the country allows you to leave, all the better for the country, but if you take my son with you I will follow you wherever you go, and shoot you. "This statement is not correct. The message was sent some days ago, and not after the trial ended. Lord Queensberry did not stay he would shoot Mr. Wilde. What he said was that "If he persuaded his misguided son to go with him he would feel quite satisfied in following him (Wilde) and shooting him, did he feel inclined to do so, and was he worth the trouble."

About "The Chameleon,"

Messrs. Ward, Perks, and M'Kay have written the following letter to the Press:

"On behalf of Messrs. Gay and Bird, the publishers of the first and only number of this publication, we ask you to be good enough to allow us to say through your columns that our clients of their own act stopped the sale directly they were aware of the contents of the magazine. Such sale was not stopped at the request of a contributor or anyone else. They were requested to renew the sale, and refused. Had the trial proceeded we should, at the proper time, have tendered our clients to give the above facts in evidence."

The Family Feud.

"You may say from me myself," said Lord Douglas of Hawick to an interview yesterday afternoon, "that I and every member of our family, excepting my father, disbelieve absolutely and entirely the allegations of the defence. It is in my opinion, simply a part of the persecution which my father has carried on against us ever since I can remember. I think Mr. Wilde and his counsel to blame for not showing as they could have done, that was the fact."

Oscar's Plays Still Run.

Oscar's plays were produced last night as usual at the Haymarket and the St. James's Theatre, and at neither place was there any hostile demonstration. At the latter theatre, however, it was noticed that except in those portions of the building reserved and prepaid the audience was much similar than usual. In one or two places slightly discordant remarks were made especially when reference was made to the town of Worthing, but these chiefly came from the gallery and were of a trifting character.

The management of the New York Lyceum Theatre where "An Ideal Husband," is now running, have decided to remove the author's name from the bills and programs. Miss Rose Coghlan, who has been playing "A Woman of No Importance," in the Western State has received to omit the play from her répertoire.

At the Central Criminal Court, yesterday, before Mr. Justice Collins, the Marquis of Queensberry again surrendered to his bail to further answer an indictment charging him with having published a defamatory libel of and concerning Mr. Oscar Wilde, by leaving a card containing a serious charge against him at Mr. Wilde’s club—the Albemarle. The Marquis of Queensberry pleaded justification. Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., Mr. C. Matthews and Mr. Travers Humphreys prosecuted; Mr. Carson, Q.C., Mr. C.F. Gill. and Mr. A. Gill defended the Marquis of Queensberry; and Mr. Besley and Mr. Monckton watched the case on behalf of Lord Douglas of Hawick. Mr. Oscar Wilde was not present in court.

Mr. Carson, Q.C., proceeded with his speech for the defence. He contended that he had already shown, from Mr. Wilde's writings and admissions, that Lord Queensberry was absolutely justified in bringing to a climax this question been Mr. Wilde and his (Lord Queensberry’s) son. Distasteful as the task would be to him, he had now to discuss the more painful part of the case, viz., the evidence which it would be his duty to lay before the jury. Mr. Carson then proceeded to describe the nature of the evidence in support of the plea of justification and was alluding to the doings of Mr. Oscar Wilde at the Savoy Hotel, doings in regard to which, he said, the wonder was, not that they reached the ears of the Marquis of Queensberry, but that, in the face of such rumours, Mr. Wilde had been tolerated in society in London the length of time he had.

Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., who, with Mr. Matthews, have left the court during Mr. Carson’s address, and who now returned, after a hurried conversation with Mr. Carson, rose, and addressing his lordship, said: Will you allow me to interpose at this moment and to make a statement which is, of course, made under a feeling of great responsibility. My learned friend, Mr. Carson, yesterday addressed the jury upon the question of the literature involved in this case and from the inferences to be drawn from the admissions made by and the letters read yesterday with regard to Mr. Oscar Wilde. My learned friend began his address this morning by saying that he hoped that he had said enough yesterday, dealing with those topics, to induce the jury to believe from the necessity of dealing in detail with other issues of this case. My lord, I think it must have been present to your lordship’s mind that those representing Mr. Oscar Wilde in this case have before them a very terrible anxiety. We could not conceal from ourselves that the judgement that might be formed of that literature and of the conduct which has been admitted, might not improbably induce the jury to say that when Lord Queensberry used the words that he did, he was using words of which there was sufficient justification to entitle a father to use, and, under these circumstances to be relieved from a criminal charge in respect of that statement. That being our clear view—that that would not improbably be the result of the issue of that part of the case—I and my learned friends, who desire to be associated with me in this matter, have to look forward to this—that the verdict given in favour of the defendant on that part of the case might be interpreted outside as a conclusive finding with regard to all parts of the case and the position in which we stood was this—that without expecting to obtain a verdict in this case, we should be going through, day by day, it might be, matters of a most appalling character. Under these circumstances, I hope your lordship will think that I am taking the right course, which I take after communication with Mr. Oscar Wilde, and having regard to what has already been referred to by my learned friend, in respect to the matters connected with the literature and letters, when I say that I feel we could not resist a verdict of not guilty in this case. I hope, therefore, that your lordship will not think I am going beyond the bounds of my duty and that I am doing something to save and to prevent what would be most terrible task, however it might close, if I now interpose, and say on behalf of Mr. Oscar Wilde that he would ask to withdraw from the prosecution. If your lordship does not think, after what has taken place, that I ought to be allowed to do that, on his behalf, my lord, I am prepared to submit to a verdict of not guilty, having reference, if to any part of the particulars at all, to that part connected with the publication of "Dorian Grey" and "The Chameleon." I trust that this suggestion may meet with the approbation of the Court and my learned friend.

Mr. Carson—I do not know that I have any right whatever to interfere in any way in the application my learned friend has made. I can only say, as far as Lord Queensberry is concerned, that if there is a plea of not guilty—a plea which involves that he has succeeded in his plea of justification—I am quite satisfied. Of course, my learned friend would admit that we must succeed on that plea in the manner in which he has said, and, that being so, it will rest entirely with your lordship as to whether the course suggested by my learned friend ought to be taken.

Mr Justice Collins—Inasmuch as the prosecutor in this case is prepared to acquiesce in verdict of not guilty against the accused, I do not think it is any part of the function of the judge or of the jury to insist on going into details which can have no bearing on the matter which is already concluded by the assent of the prosecutor to an adverse verdict. But as to jury putting any limitation on their verdict, the justification is one which is a justification or not of the charge. If that is justified it is justified, and if it is not it is not, and the verdict of the jury upon it must be Guilty or Not Guilty. As I understand the prosecutor assents to a verdict of Not Guilty, there can be no terms, there can be no limitations—the verdict must be Guilty or Not Guilty; and as I understand the prosecutor assents to a verdict of Not Guilty, the jury will of course return that verdict.

Mr. Carson—The verdict will be that the plea of justification is proved, and that it is for the public benefit.

Mr. Justice Collins—Of course that is involved in the verdict.The verdict will be not guilty, but it is arrived at by that process. I should have had to tell the jury that two things ought to be established. One, that the justification set up was true, and secondly, that the statement was published in such a manner as to be for the public benefit. If they find those two things in favour of the defendant then he would be entitled to a verdict of not guilty. That is, I understand, the right verdict to which the jury ought to come. You will have to say whether you find complete justification has been proved or not.

The jury, without leaving the box, almost immediately came to a conclusion, the foreman stating that they found the plea of justification had been proved, and that the defendant was not guilty, the foreman adding: And we also find that it was published for the public benefit. (Applause.)

Mr. Carson, Q.C.,—Costs to the defendant will follow?

Mr. Justice Collins—You are entitled to it.

Mr. Carson, Q.C.,—May I ask that Lord Queensberry be discharged?

Mr. Justice Collins—Certainly.

As the Marquis quitted the dock there was loud applause in the court, no attempt being made to suppress it, and he was immediately surrounded and congratulated by his friends. The court adjourned until Monday.

—

At Bow-street Police-court yesterday afternoon Mr. Angus Lewis, of the Treasury Solicitors' Department, attended before Sir John Bridge and made a private application, which it was understood resulted in the issue of a warrant for the apprehension of Mr. Oscar Wilde on certain grave charges. At any rate, that gentleman was arrested between six and seven o'clock in the evening at the Cadogan Hotel, Sloane-street, and conveyed to Bow-street Station after a short visit to Scotland Yard. He will be brought before the magistrate to-day.

—

Sir,—on behalf of Messrs. Gay and Bird, the publishers of the first and only number of this publication, we ask you to be good enough to allow us to say through your columns that our clients, of their own act, stopped the sale directly they were aware of the contents of the magazine. Such sale was not stopped at the request of the contributor or anyone else. They were requested to renew the sale and refused. Had the trial proceeded we should, at the proper time, have tendered our clients to give the above facts in evidence.—We are, your obedient servants,

WARD, PERKS, and McKAY.

WARD, PERKS, and McIKAY.

85, Gracechurch-street, E.C.