Compare Documents

It is somewhat curious that Mr. Carson, the cross-examiner, and Oscar Wilde, the cross-examined, had been schoolfellows together. I have known the latter, off and on, for years. Clever and witty he unquestionably is, but I have always regarded him as somewhat wrong in the head, for his craving after notoriety seemed to me a positive craze. There was nothing that he would not do to attract attention. When he went over to New York he went about dressed in a bottle-green coat with a waist up to his shoulders. When he entered a restaurant people threw things at him. When he drove in the evening to deliver his lectures the windows of his carriage were broken, until a policeman rode on each side of it. Far from objecting to all this, it filled him with delighted complacency. "Insult me, throw mud at me, but only look at me," seemed to be his creed; and such a creed was never acted upon by any one whose mind was not out of balance. So strange and wondrous is his mind when in an abnormal condition, that it would not surprise me if he were deriving a keen enjoyment from a position which most people, whether really innocent or guilty, would prefer to die rather than occupy. He must have known in what a glass-house he lived when he challenged investigation in a court of justice. After he had done this, he went abroad. Why did he not stay abroad? The possibilities of a prison may not be pleasing to him, but I believe that the notoriety that has overtaken him has such a charm for him, that it outweighs everything else.

I remember, in the early days of the cult of aestheticism, hearing some one ask him how a man of his undoubted capacity could make such a fool of himself. He gave this explanation. He had written, he said, a book of poems, and he believed in their excellence. In vain he went from publisher to publisher asking them to bring them out; not one would even read them, for he was unknown. In order to find a publisher he felt that he must do something to become a personality. So he hit upon aestheticism. It succeeded. People talked about him; they invited him to their houses as a sort of lion. He then took his poems to a publisher, who—still without reading them—gladly accepted them.

Robert Sherard, a well-known Parisian journalist, is suing Mr M'Carthy, of the British Consulate, for criminal libel arising out of the Oscar Wilde case.

Mr Labouchere, in 'Truth,' says that he has always regarded Oscar Wilde as somewhat "wrong in the head." "So strange and wondrous is his mind," remarks the observant editor of 'Truth,' "when in an abnormal condition, that it would not surprise me if he were deriving keen enjoyment from a position which most people, whether innocent or guilty, would prefer to die rather than occupy. He must have known in what a glass house he lived when he challenged investigation in a court of justice. After he had done this, he went abroad. Why did he not stay abroad? The possibilities of a prison may not be pleasant to him, but I believe the notoriety that has overtaken him has such a charm for him that it outweighs everything else. I remember in the early days of the cult of asceticism hearing Mr St. George ask him how a man of his undoubted capability could make such a fool of himself. He gave this explanation: He had written, he said, a book of poems; in vain he went from publisher to publisher asking them to bring them out, for not one would even read them, for he was unknown. In order to find a publisher he felt that he must do something to become a personality; so he hit upon asceticism, which caused people to talk about him and to invite him to other houses as a sort of lion. He then took him poems to a publisher, who, still without reading them, gladly accepted the M.S."