Compare Documents

The hearing of the charge against the Marquess of Queensberry of criminally libelling Mr. Oscar Wilde was resumed yesterday morning at the Central Criminal Court, before Mr. Justice Henn Collins. The defence was a justification of the libel.— The counsel for the prosecution were Sir E. Clarke, Q.C., Mr. C. Mathews, and Mr. Travers Humphreys. Mr. Carson, Q.C., Mr. C. F. Gill, Q.C, and Mr. A. Gill appeared for Lord Queensberry ; while Mr. Besley, Q.C., and Mr. Monckton watched the case for Lord Douglas of Hawick, the eldest son of the Marquess.

The public galleries were again crowded, the greatest interest being shown in the proceedings. The Judge took his seat at half-past ten. Mr. Oscar VVilde was not present when Mr. Carson rose to resume his speech for the defence.

Mr. Carson said that at the adjournment yesterday he had dealt as fully as he intended to deal with the question of Wilde's connection with the literature that had been produced in this case, and also with the two letters that had been read, and he almost hoped that he had sufficiently demonstrated upon these matters, which were not really in dispute, that Lord Queensberry was absolutely justified in bringing to a climax, in the way that he did, the question of the connection between Mr. Oscar Wilde and his son. He had, unfortunately, a more powerful part of the case now to approach. It would be his painful duty to bring before the Jury those young men, one after another, to tell their tale. It was, of course, even for an advocate, a distasteful task ; but let those who were inclined to condemn these men for allowing themselves to be dominated, misled, and corrupted by Oscar Wilde remember the relative position of the two parties, and that they were men more sinned against than sinning. He was not going in great detail to criticise the evidence of Wilde with regard to the several transactions as to which he cross-examined him. There was a general observation applicable to all the cases There was a startling similarity between each of them, on Wilde's own admission, which must lead the Jury to draw the most painful conclusions. There was the fact that in not one of those cases were the parties upon an equality with Wilde in anyway. They were not educated parties such as he would naturally associate with, they were not his equal in years, and there was a curious similiarity between the ages of each of them. Mr. Wilde said that there was something beautiful and charming about youth that led him to adopt the course he did. but was he unable to find more suitable companions who were at the same time young among the youths of his own class ? The thing was absurd. His excuse in the box was only a travesty of what was the reality of the matter. Who were these younp men ? They were out of employment, and of their antecedents Wilde professed to know nothing. All of them were from 18 to 20 years of age, or thereabouts, and in the manner of their introduction to Wilde and his subsequent treatment of them all were in the same category, leading to the same conclusion, that there was something unnatural and what might not ordinarily be expected in the relations between them. Parker was a gentleman's servant out of employment. He and his brother were in a restaurant in Piccadilly and were met by Taylor, and when a day or two later Wilde gave Taylor a dinner on his birthday, telling him to bring any friends he liked, what an idea he must have had of Wilde's taste when he brought a groom and a valet ! If that one fact was true — and the main features had been admitted by Wilde — why did Taylor speak to those young men at all, and why did he bring them to dine with Wilde ? There could be no explanation of these matters but the one that Tavlor was the procureur for Wilde. They would hear from Parker, when he came to tell his unfortunate story, that he was poor, out of place, and fell a victim to Wilde. He would tell them that on the first evening they met Wilde addressed him — the valet — as Charlie, and that he addressed this distinguished dramatist, whose name was being spoken everywhere in London as the author of a most successful play, as Oscar. He did not wish to say anything about Wilde's theories of putting an end to social distinctions. It might be a very noble and generous instinct in some people to wish to level down all social barriers ; but one thing that was plain in this case was that Wilde's conduct was not regulated by any very generous instincts towards these young men. If he wanted to assist Parker was it of benefit for a man in Wilde's position in society and literature to take him to a magnificent dinner and prime him with the best champagne ? All the ridiculous excuses of Wiide would not bear a moment's examination. Wilde pretended that the whole of these dinners and lunches were mere generous actions on his part. He gave no explanation of why he had that suite of rooms at the Savoy Hotel. It was a large hotel, and Wilde had no difficulty in taking Parker into his rooms, where he treated him with whiskies and sodas, and some of that iced champagne which his doctor forbade Wilde to have. There had been no open scandal at the Savoy Hotel ; but a man could not live that kind of life without gossip going abroad and reports being circulated in the circles in which he mixed. After they heard the evidence from the Savoy Hotel they would wonder, not that the gossip reached Lord Queensberry's ears, but that the man Wilde had been tolerated for years in Society as he had. He referred to the youth Parker, who was coming there with the greatest reluctance, and was now earning for himself a good character in the Country, and Wilde's dealings with the boy Conway.

Mr. Carson was proceeding when Sir E. Clarke spoke to him, and they consulted for a moment.

Sir Edward Clarke then said :— Will your Lordship allow me to interpose and make a statement, which is, of course, made under a feeling of very grave respon-sibility. My learned friend Mr. Carson yesterday addressed the Jury upon the question of the literature involved in this case, and upon the inferences to be drawn from admissions made with regard to the letters read yesterday. My learned friend began his address by saying that he hoped the need of having the Jury deal with those details could be avoided. I think it must have been present to your mind that the representatives of Mr. Oscar Wilde have beFore them in this case a very terrible anxiety. They could not conceal from themselves the inferences which might be drawn might not improperly induce the Jury to say that when Lord Queensberry used the words "posing as" he was using words which there was a sufficient justification for a father to use. That in our view might not he an improbable result of that part of the case. I and my learned friends who are with me had to look forward to this — that a verdict given in favour of the Defendant upon that point might be regarded as a finding with regard to all parts of the case. The position we stood in was that, in view of the finding of a verdict, we would be going through long evidence dealing with matters of a most appalling character. In these circumstances, I hope your Lordship will think I am taking the right course or action. Having regard to what has been already said in respect of the literature and of the letters, I feel that I could not resist a verdict of Not Guilty in this case — not guilty, that is, having reference to the words "posing as." In these circumstances, I hope your Lordship will think that I am not going beyond the bounds of duty, and that I am doing something to save and to prevent what would be a most terrible task, however it might close, if I now interpose to say that, on behalf of Mr. Oscar Wilde, I would ask to withdraw from the prosecution. If your Lordship does not think that at this time of the case, and after what has taken place, I ought to be allowed to do this, I am prepared to submit to a verdict of Not Guilty, having reference — if to any part of the particulars — to that part of the particulars which is connected with the publication of "Dorian Gray" and with the publication of the Chameleon. I trust, my Lord, that that may make an end of the case.

Mr. Carson. — I do not know that I have any right whatever to interfere in any way in the application my learned friend has made. I can only say, as far as Lord Queensberry is concerned, that if there is a plea of Not Guilty — a plea which involves that he has succeeded in his complete justification — I am quite satisfied. Of course, my learned friend would admit that we must succeed on that plea in the manner in which he has said, and, that being so, it will rest entirely with your Lordship as to whether the course suggested by my learned friend ought to be taken.

Mr. Justice Collins. — Inasmuch as the Prosecutor in this case is prepared to acquiesce in a verdict of Not Guilty against the Accused, I do not think it is any part of the function of the Judge or of the Jury to insist on going into details which can have no bearing on the matter which is already concluded by the assent of the Prosecutor. But as for putting any limitation on the verdict, the justification is one which is a justification of the charge of "posing as." If that is justified it is justified, and if it is not it is not, and the verdict of the Jury upon it must be Guilty or Not Guilty. As I understand, the Prosecutor will assent to a verdict of Not Guilty. There can be no terms. There can be no limitation of the verdict, which must be Guilty or Not Guilty. I understand the Prosecutor to assent to a verdict of Not Guilty, and of course the Jury will return a verdict of Not Guilty.

Mr. Carson.— The verdict will be that complete justification is proved, and that the publication was for the public benefit.

The Judge.— The verdict will be Not Guilty, but it is arrived at by that process of course. I shall have to tell the Jury that the justification was proved, and that it was true in substance and in fact that the Prosecutor had "posed as." And I shall also have to tell them that they will have to find that the statement was published in such a manner as to be for the public benefit. If they find on these two points the verdict will be Not Guilty.

A few seconds later the Judge, turning to the Jury, said : Your verdict will be Not Guilty ; but there are other matters which have to be determined with reference to the specific finding of complete justification, and as I told you, that involves that the statement is true in fact and that the publication is for the public benefit. These are the facts on which you will have to find, and if you find them in favour of the Defendant, your verdict will be Not Guilty. You will have to say whether you find complete justification has been proved or not.

The Jury without leaving the box signified in a few minutes that they had arrived at their decision.

The Clerk of Arraigns.— Do you find the complete justification proved or not ?

The Foreman of the Jury.— Yes.

The Clerk.— Do you find a verdict of Not Guilty ?

The Foreman. — Yes.

The Clerk.— And that is the verdict of you all ?

The Foreman. — Yes ; and we also find that the pub- lication was for the public benefit.

The verdict was received with applause, of which the Judge took no notice and becoming known in the streets, there was a demonstration of approval on the part of a large crowd.

Mr. Carson.— The costs will follow. May I ask that Lord Queensberry should be discharged.

The Judge. — Certainly.

Lord Queensberry then left the dock and came into the well of the Court, where he received the congratulations of his friends.

—

Mr. Oscar Wilde, who had been in consultation with his counsel in the vicinity of the Court, left the Old Bailey a few minutes before Sir Edward Clarke made his withdrawal. He drove in his carriage, drawn by a pair of horses, to the Holborn Viaduct Hotel, where he has lunched daily during the trial. Here Mr. Wilde, Lord Alfred Douglas, Mr. Wilde's solicitor, and one or two other gentlemen remained for some time in consultation. When they left he drove in a brougham to the West-end.

After the close of the case, the following letter was addressed by Mr. Charles Russell, the Marquess of Queensberry's solicitor, to the Public Prosecutor : —

"37, Norfolk-street. Strand. " Dear Sir,— In order that there may be no miscarriage of justice. I think it my duty at once to send you a copy of all our Witnesses' statements, together with a copy of the shorthand notes of trial. — Yours faithfully, "Charles Russell."

Immediately after the House of Commons met yesterday, a representative of the Public Prosecutor had an interview with the Home Secretary, the Attorney General, and the Solicitor General in regard to the case of Mr. Oscar Wilde. It was at once agreed that a warrant should be applied for, and Mr. Asquith gave instructions that, wherever Wilde might be found, he should be stopped.

There was a great deal of excitement at the Bow- street Police-court yesterday afternoon in consequence of a report that a warrant would be applied for for the arrest of Mr. Oscar Wilde. Sir John Bridge was the presiding Magistrate, having taken the place of Mr. Vaughan early in the morning. When Sir John Bridge took his seat after the luncheon interval, Mr. Angus Lewis, of the Treasury, intimated that he would like to speak to him privately. Sir John assented, and the Magistrate and Barrister carried on a whispered conversation for a few minutes. What actually took place did not transpire, but it was understood that Mr. Lewis intimated to Sir John Bridge that he might have an important application to make to him later in the afternoon. Detective Inspector Brockwell was also in attendance. With him were two youths whose names figured prominently in the Wilde v. Queensberry case. Sir John Bridge did not return to the Court after disposing of the summonses, but it is understood that he saw Mr. Angus Lewis, Mr. C. F. Gill, and Mr. Charles Russell in his private room, and afterwards granted a warrant for the arrest of Mr. Oscar Wilde.

The arrest was made by Inspector Richards last evening at the Cadogan Hotel, Sloane-street, to which place Mr. Wilde drove after leaving the Holborn Viaduct Hotel. The Inspector, who had with him Sergeant Allen, made the arrest about half-past six o'clock. On the senior officer asking for Mr. Wilde he was told he was not there ; but on the Inspector insisting, he was conducted to his room. Mr. Wilde had with him two friends, and the Inspector stated the object of his visit. Mr. Wilde made no reply, and the party at once drove to Scotland-yard to meet Inspector Brockwell, who had the warrant for the arrest. The warrant was read to the Prisoner, who made no reply, and after some delay he was taken to Bow-street Police-station, arriving there at 8.10 in a four-wheel cab. Mr. Wilde, who was the first to alight, walked straight into the station followed by the detectives. He was dressed in a long black frock coat, dark trousers, and silk hat, and did not appear in the slightest way to be affected by the circumstances of his position. He was at once placed in the dock, and stood there with his hands in his pockets while the charge was taken down by Inspector Digby. When the charge had been entered Mr. Wilde was escorted to the cells.

Shortly after the Prisoner's arrival at Bow-street a friend of Mr. Wilde, drove up with a small gladstone bag, containing a change of clothes and other necessaries for Mr. Wilde, but, after a short interview with the inspector on duty, that gentleman returned to his cab with the bag, not being allowed to leave it. Later on Lord Alfred Douglas visited Bow-street to see if he could bail out Mr. Wilde, and appeared much distressed when he was informed that on no consideration could his application be entertained. He then offered to procure extra comforts in the shape of bedding for his friend, but this offer was also refused by the officer on duty. Mr. Wilde occupies an ordinary cell, but will be allowed to supply himself with any extra food he thinks fit. He will be brought up this morning at tea o'clock at Bow-street Police-station.

The Marquess of Queensberry states that as soon as the trial ended yesterday, he sent this message to Mr. Oscar Wilde : — " If the country allows you to leave, all the better for the country, but if you take my son with you, I will follow you wherever you go and shoot you."

The hearing of the libel action brought by Mr. Oscar Wilde against the Marquess of Queensberry was resumed to-day at the Central Criminal Court, before Mr. Justice Collins and a common jury. Sir E. Clarke, Q.C., M.P., Mr. C. Mathews, and Mr. Travers Humphreys are counsel for Mr. Oscar Wilde; Mr. R. Carson, Q.C., M.P., Mr. C. F. Gill, and Mr. A. Gill appeared for the Marquess; and Mr. Besley, Q.C., and Mr. Monckton held a watching brief for Lord Alfred Douglas of Hawick.

The galleries and body of the court were again thronged by half-past nine o'clock, and until the reappearance of the learned judge barristers and numbers of the public spent their time in purusing the reports in the morning papers of yesterday's proceedings. From the floor of the building to the ceiling printed broadsheets were everywhere visible, the noisy rustling of the papers mingling with the incessant chatter going on as to the prospects of the case.

Lord Queensberry had this morning made a slight change in his attire. Entering the dock with a confident air he threw off a great coat disclosing an under garment of a moss-green hue and a neat white silk necktie. His Lordship occupied himself with a newspaper until Mr. Justice Collins appeared.

Mr. Carson resumed his address for the defence at half-past ten o'clock with the observation that he hoped he had justified Lord Queensberry in the bringing to a climax in the way he did the connection between his son and Mr. Oscar Wilde. He had now a more painful duty to approach. He had to comment upon other evidence which was supplemental to what he might call plain, clear, and admitted facts. It would be his painful task to call these several young men to tell their own tale. He would show that Taylor acted as an intermediary for Wilde. It had been said by Wilde in the witness-box that he wished to break down social distinctions. That might be a noble and generous instinct, but Wilde had not shown very generous instincts in his treatment of these youths. Declaring with much emphasis, "It is a wonder this man Wilde has been tolerated in London society so long as he has," Mr. Carson proceeded to give details as to conduct at the Savoy Hotel, and elsewhere, which cannot be even indicated. "I regret," proceeded the learned counsel, "to be obliged to put into the witness-box the young man Parker, for he has since entered the service of his country, and has had no black mark against him. Since putting on Her Majesty's uniform he bears an excellent character, and I trust his past experience has been a lesson to him." Mr. Carson then characterised Wilde's behaviour in regard to the fisher-boy at Worthing as an instance of his disgusting audacity. He picked this boy up on the pier, introduced him to his family, dressed him up as a gentleman, and put public school colours upon his hat. The facts in regard to this boy would not have been accepted had they been proved out if any person's mouth, except that of Wilde himself. They almost passed belief.

Mr. Carson was continuing his argument, when Sir Edward Clarke and Mr. Mathews retired from the court for a moment.

The plaintiff Wilde had up to this point been absent.

On Sir Edward Clarke returning he gave a whispered intimation to Mr. Carson, who thereupon resumed his seat.

Sir E Clarke, then rising, said:—My Lord—I here interpose to make a statement which I do under a feeling of gravest responsibility. Mr. Carson yesterday addressed the jury upon the question of the literature involved in this case, and upon inferences to be drawn from admissions made with regard to the letters of Mr. Oscar Wilde. My learned friend began his address this morning by saying I that he hoped he had yesterday said enough in dealing with these topics to influence the jury, and to relieve them from the necessity of dealing in detail with the other issues in this case. I feel it must have been present to your Lordship's mind that those representing Mr. Oscar Wilde had before them a very terrible anxiety They could not conceal from themselves that the judgment that might be formed of the literature and of conduct which bad been admitted might not improbably induce the jury to say that when Lord Queensberry used those words which constituted the libel be was using words for which there was sufficient justification -that as a father he was entitled to use those words under the circumstances, and to be relieved from a criminal charge in respect of the statement. In our view we thought that that might not improbably be the result upon that part of the case. I and my learned friends who desire to be associated with me in this matter have looked forward to a verdict given in favour of the defendant upon that part of this case, and that such a verdict might be interpreted outside as a sufficient justification with regard to all other points. The position in which we stood was that without expecting to obtain a verdict we should be going on-from day to day, it might be-with a large amount of evidence in the investigation of matters of the most appalling character. Under these circumstances I hope your Lordship will think I am taking a right course, which I take after communicating with Mr. Oscar Wilde, in saying that having regard to what has already been adduced by my learned friend, Mr. Carson, in respect of the matters connected with the literature and the letters, I feel that he could not resist a verdict of not guilty in reference to the words which constituted the libel. Under these circumstances I hope your lordship will not think I am going beyond the bounds of duty, and that I am doing something to avoid what would be a most terrible task if I now interpose and say on behalf of Mr. Oscar Wilde that I ask to withdraw from the prosecution, and that I am on his behalf prepared to submit to a verdict of not guilty in respect of that part of the particulars connected with the publication of "Dorian Grey" and the Chameleon.

The statement of the hon. and learned gentleman produced a profound sensation in the crowded court.

Mr. Carson: I do not know, my lord, that I have any right to interfere at this stage in any way except to submit that as far as Lord Queensberry is concerned, if there is to be a verdict of not guilty, it involves also a verdict of justification. If your lordship takes that view I am satisfied. We must succeed in that plea, and upon that depends whether the course suggested by my learned friend can be adopted.

Mr. Justice Collins: As to the jury putting any limitation upon the verdict the charge contained in the words which constituted the libel is either justified or it is not justified. The verdict of the jury must be guilty or not guilty, and I understand the prosecution assent to a verdict of not guilty. There can be no limitation, and if the jury assent to the course suggested they will return a verdict of not guilty, and they will find that the justification set up was true in substance and in fact, and that it was published for the public benefit.

The jury consulted for a moment, and the Foreman in reply to the usual question said, "We find the defendant not guilty."

The Clerk of the Court: And do you also find that the plea of justification was true in substance and in fact?

The Foreman: We do, and that it was published for the public benefit.

Mr. Carson at once asked that Lord Queensberry be discharged from custody.

Mr. Justice Collins intimated his assent, and replying to a question from the learned counsel also certified for costs.

The Marquess was congratulated as he descended the steps of the dock to the well of the Court.

The feelings of the public and the bar found vent in a flood of excitable conversation, and with the disappearance of the learned judge from the tribunal the scene ended, and the court was rapidly cleared.

The Exchange Telegraph Company says that the evidence and full shorthand notes have been sent to the Public Prosecutor by Lord Queensberry's solicitor, that there may be no miscarriage of justice.

Those who have followed the reports of the miserable case which came to such a sensational end this morning will not—the Globe surmises—be surprised at the result. After the evidence given yesterday by Mr. Oscar Wilde, he was well advised in withdrawing from the case, and the Marquess of Queensberry may be congratulated upon having entirely justified the action which he took to rescue his son from his very undesirable companionship.

There was loud applause, and practically no attempt made to suppress it, as Lord Queensberry stepped out of the dock and joined his solicitor in the well of the court. Amid general excitement over the sensational nature of the end to a sensational case the court was rapidly emptied of its crowded audience.

It appeared that Mr. Oscar Wilde had been somewhere in the precincts of the court. His brougham was in waiting, and he stepped rapidly into it, calling to the coachman to drive to the Holborn Viaduct Hotel. Before the carriage had stopped at the door of the hotel he thrust his arm and a gold-headed cane out of the window, and signalling to a man who stood here apparently waiting, hoarsely cried, "The verdict not guilty." They entered the hotel together, and shortly afterwards Lord Alfred Douglas was also seen to go into the hotel.

The Exchange Telegraph Company states that Mr. Oscar Wilde went to the Old Bailey this morning, but did not enter the precincts of the court. He had a consultation with Sir Edward Clarke in a room off the court, and while counsel was making his statement to the Judge Mr. Wilde hurriedly left the building.

LETTER TO THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.

The same agency has authority for stating that no warrant has been applied for, but on leaving the court Mr. Charles Russell, Lord Queensberry's solicitor, addressed the following letter to the Public Prosecutor:—

37, Norfolk Street, Strand. The Hon. Hamilton Cuffe, E-q., Director of Prosecutions. Dear Sir,—In order that there may be no miscarriage of justice, I think it my duty at once to send you a copy of all our witnesses' statements together with a copy of the shorthand notes of the trial.—Yours faithfully, Charles Russell. The Treasury, Whitehall.

The feeling in London against Wilde is very strong, and the public indignation finds vent in the freest expressions of opinion.

A LETTER FROM WILDE.

Is it a joke? The Evening News has received the following letter from Oscar Wilde, written on the note-paper of the Holborn Viaduct Hotel:—

To the Editor,—It would have been impossible for me to have proved my case without putting Lord Alfred Douglas in the witness-box against his father. Lord Alfred Douglas was extremely anxious to go into the box, but I would not let him do so. Rather than put him in so painful a position I determined to retire from the case, and to bear on my own shoulders whatever ignominy and shame might result from my prosecuting Lord Queensberry. Oscar Wilde.

WHERE IS OSCAR?

According to the St. James's Gazette a rumour is current that Wilde has already quitted the country. If so, he must have lost no time. It is to be presumed, however, that the police authorities have not been guilty of the laxity of allowing him to do anything of the kind. They must have been aware, after the turn the case took yesterday, that their services might be called for; and they will have grossly neglected their duty if they have permitted him to leave the country. Perhaps it may, in charity, bee hoped that Wilde himself has some innocent explanation of the circumstances that look so damning against him, and is himself anxious to stay and meet his accusers.

WILDE'S RENDEZVOUS.

There is some ground for supposing that the "Prosecutor" had appointed the Viaduct Hotel as a rendezvous with his particular friends. Within half-an-hour of his arrival there several gentlemen arrived hurriedly, and were conducted at once to the rooms which had been reserved for Mr. Wilde since yesterday. The brougham, with two smart little brown horses, was driven slowly up and down the Viaduct, pausing once while the coachman received instructions from Lord Alfred Douglas, who came out bareheaded with the hall porter. These movements were closely watched in a number of interests, and it is reported that Scotland Yard was keeping a provisional eye on the hotel. The hotel, it may be stated, is at the terminus of a railway running to the Continent.

LORD QUEENSBERRY IS TRIUMPHANT.

Mr. Oscar Wilde may now, says the Echo, change places with Lord Queensberry and go into the dock himself and have Lord Queensberry's evidence against hun. He appears to have illustrated in his life the beauty and truthfulness of his teachings. He said, in cross-examination, that he considered 'there was no such thing as morality, and he seems to have harmonised his practice with his theory. The counsel for the prosecution, the judge and jury, are entitled to public thanks for abruptly terminating the trial and so preventing the publication of probably revolting revelations. The best thing for everybody now is to forget all about Oscar Wilde, his perpetual posings, his aesthetical teachings, and his theatrical productions. If not tried himself, let him go into silence and be heard of no more.

SIGNIFICANT TALK AT BOW STREET.

At half-past two this afternoon Mr. Angus Lewis, of the Treasury, attended at Bow Street, accompanied by Detective-inspector Brockwell, of Scotland Yard, and had a private conversation with Sir John Bridge. It is understood the learned counsel asked whether it would be convenient for the magistrate to take a certain case to-day in reference to the recent libel suit at the Old Bailey.

A PLAY TO BE ABANDONED.

The Sun states that the issue of the warrant is imminent, and that the reproduction of one of Oscar Wilde's plays has been abandoned.

A CONSULTATION.

Sir John Bridge proceeded this afternoon to the Treasury, and cases stood over until his return to Bow Street.

WITHDRAWN FROM THE PLAYBILLS.

Mr. Moreli, of the Haymarket Theatre, and Mr. Alexander, of the St. James's, have withdrawn Oscar Wilde's name from the playbills.

QUEENSBERRY'S LAST WORD TO OSCAR.

The Marquess of Queensberry said to an Evening News reporter this afternoon:—

"I have sent a message to Oscar, saying: 'If the country allows you to leave all the better for the country, but if you take my son with you I will follow you wherever you go and shoot you."

A WARRANT APPLIED FOR.

The Central News says:—It is understood that a warrant in connection with the libel case was applied for at five o'clock this evening, and it is believed that the application was granted. The application was made in Sir John Bridge's private room, and the officials are reticent on the subject. Mr. Charles Russell and Mr. Angus Lewis, of the Treasury, were in attendance, and it is further understood that the application for the warrant was made by them.