Compare Documents
This page compares two reports at the document level. The column on the left shows the first report and the column in the middle shows the second. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two documents. Pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage shows the percentage of similarity between the two documents.
Nanaimo Free Press - Wednesday, May 1, 1895
London, May 1 — In the Old Bailey to-day, Justice Charles summed up the case against Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor. The Justice, in so doing, said that counsel for the prosecution acted wisely in withdrawing the charge of conspiracy brought against Wilde, as he, Justice Charles, would have ordered the jury to bring to a verdict of not guilty on that specification. He admitted that there was corroboration of the witness, but the jury, he added, would have to weigh the characters of men like Parker, Wood and Atkins, whom Sir Edward Clarke, in the Justice’s opinion, properly described as blackmailers. The justice also urged the jury not to be influenced by Wilde’s writings, saying that many great men had written indecently. The jury must exercise their own judgement as to whether Wilde’s letters to Lord Alfred Douglas breathed an unutterable passion, and he also said the relations between Shelly and Wilde would be an interesting matter for the jury’s judgement.
London, May 1 — The Wilde Jury disagreed.
The Philadelphia Times - Thursday, May 2, 1895
LONDON, May 1. - The jury in the case against Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor failed to agree after about two hours’ deliberation and were discharged. Bail being refused both Wilde and Taylor were remanded to jail to await a second trial.
Justice Chester, in summing up the case, said that counsel for the prosecution acted wisely in withdrawing the charge of conspiracy against Wilde, as he would have ordered the jury to bring in a verdict of "not guilty" on that specification. He admitted that there was corroboration of the witnesses, but the jury, he added, would have to weigh the characters of men like Parker, Wood and Atkins, whom Sir Edward Clarke, in the Justice’s opinion, properly described as blackmailers.
The Justice also urged the jury not to be influenced by Wilde's writings, saying that many great men had written indecently. The jury must exercise their own judgment as to whether Wilde’s letters to Lord Alfred Douglas breathed an unnatural passion, and, he also said, the relations between Shelly and Wilde would be interesting matter for the jury's judgment.