Compare Documents
This page compares two reports at the document level. The column on the left shows the first report and the column in the middle shows the second. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two documents. Pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage shows the percentage of similarity between the two documents.
Hong Kong Daily Press - Tuesday, April 23, 1895
LONDON, 25th March
A dispatch from Monte Carlo to the Observer says that after Oscar Wilde and Lord Alfred Douglass, the second son of the Marquis of Queensberry, arrived at the place recently they went to a hotel. But after staying there a day the proprietor, at the request of the other English visitors, informed them that their rooms were engaged. Both Mr. Wilde and Lord Alfred are now in London.
Calgary Herald - Wednesday, April 3, 1895
LONDON, March 25. — In the Old Bailey today, the recorder, Sir Charles Hall, in charging the grand jury, referred to the libel proceedings instituted by Mr. Oscar Wilde against the Marquis of Queensberry. He said that if the Marquis wrote the words which it is claimed he did upon the card produced, whether he was justified or not in so doing, it constituted a libel. Moreover, the recorder added, the defendant intended to plead justification as his defense. The grand jury eventually returned a true bill against the Marquis.
A despatch from Monte Carlo to the Observer says that after Mr. Oscar Wilde and Lord Alfred Douglas, the second son of the marquis of Queensberry, arrived at that place recently, they went to a hotel, but, after staying there a day, the proprietor, at the request of the other English visitors, informed them that their rooms were engaged. Both Mr. Wilde and Lord Alfred are now in London.