Compare Documents
This page compares two reports at the document level. The column on the left shows the first report and the column in the middle shows the second. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two documents. Pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage shows the percentage of similarity between the two documents.
The Dublin Evening Mail - Saturday, May 4, 1895
London, Saturday.Baron Pollock to-day consented to the release of Oscar Wilde on personal bail of £2,500, coupled with two sureties of £1,250 each.
The Press Association in a later message states, on the authority of Mr Humphreys, solicitor to Oscar Wilde, that after the bail had been fixed by Baron Pollock an application was made that one surety of £2,500 should be accepted, instead of two sureties of £1,250 each. The application will be renewed on Monday, when his lordship will give his decision.
Mr Humphreys states that Oscar Wilde could if necessary, find one security for £5,000.
The Cork Examiner - Monday, May 6, 1895
London, Saturday. The Press Association states that Baron Pollock to-day consented to the release of Oscar Wilde on personal bail of £2,500, coupled with two sureties of £1,250 each.
The Press Association, in a later message states that, on the authority of Mr Humphreys, solicitor to Oscar Wilde, after the bail had been fixed by Baron Pollock, an application was made that one surety of £2,500 should be accepted instead of two sureties of £1,250 each. The application will be renewed on Monday morning, when his lordship will give his decision.
Mr Humphreys states that Oscar Wilde could, if necessary, find one security for £5,000
On Saturday evening Oscar Wilde had not been released on bail. On Saturday morning the Marquis of Queensberry visited Holloway Gaol, and had an interview with the officials of the prison, which is believed to have been in reference to his son, Lord Alfred.