Compare Documents
This page compares two reports at the document level. The column on the left shows the first report and the column in the middle shows the second. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two documents. Pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage shows the percentage of similarity between the two documents.
The Cork Examiner - Tuesday, April 30, 1895
Mr. Justice Charles resumed his hearing of the charges against Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor yesterday at the Central Criminal Court, there being again a large attendance of the public. The evidence for the prosecution was continued by the examination of shorthand writers, who took notes in the case of Wilde v. the Marquis of Queensberry. The Masseur, Mr M Anton Migge , and members of the staff of the Savoy Hotel were then called against Wilde. Evidence of the arrest of both prisoners was next adduced by the police.
On the court resuming after luncheon, Mr A Gill took up the reading of Wilde's deposition where Mr C F Gill had broken off. The answers given related to the prisoner's letters to Lord Alfred Douglas, and to his denials given to the suggestions respecting witnesses for the Treasury. At a later stage, replying to a formal objection raised by Taylor's counsel, the judge said the deposition would be considered at present as evidence against Wilde only. The reading continued through the afternoon, Mr Avory assisting his two learned friends, and Sir Edward Clarke followed by reading Wilde's re-examination upon the numerous points raised in the cross-examination. The learned counsel concluded at twenty minutes to five, and Mr Gill intimated that the Crown case was now closed. His lordship at once adjourned.
The Irish News and Belfast Morning News - Tuesday, April 30, 1895
LONDON, MONDAY.Mr. Justice Charles resumed his hearing of the charge against Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor to-day at the Central Criminal Court, there being again a large attendance of the public. The evidence for the prosecution was continued by the examination of shorthand writers who took notes in Wilde v. Marquis of Queensbury. The masseur, Mr. M. Anton Nigge, and members of the staff of the Savoy Hotel were then called against Wilde. The reading of Wilde’s deposition having concluded, Mr. Gill intimated that the Crown case was now closed. His Lordship at once adjourned until to-morrow.