The Cork Examiner - Monday, May 6, 1895

London, Saturday. The Press Association states that Baron Pollock to-day consented to the release of Oscar Wilde on personal bail of £2,500, coupled with two sureties of £1,250 each.

The Press Association, in a later message states that, on the authority of Mr Humphreys, solicitor to Oscar Wilde, after the bail had been fixed by Baron Pollock, an application was made that one surety of £2,500 should be accepted instead of two sureties of £1,250 each. The application will be renewed on Monday morning, when his lordship will give his decision.

Mr Humphreys states that Oscar Wilde could, if necessary, find one security for £5,000

On Saturday evening Oscar Wilde had not been released on bail. On Saturday morning the Marquis of Queensberry visited Holloway Gaol, and had an interview with the officials of the prison, which is believed to have been in reference to his son, Lord Alfred.

The Irish News and Belfast Morning News - Monday, May 6, 1895

LONDON, SATURDAY.Mr. Baron Pollock, sitting in Chambers, decided to grant bail to the prisoner Oscar Wilde. His Lordship asked for two sureties in £1,250 each, in addition to personal bail of £2,500; but said that, should there be any difficulty in finding these sureties, a further application might be made on Monday morning, when, provided the inquiries which would be instituted by the police were satisfactory, he would be disposed to alter his conditions. No application whatever has yet been made on behalf of Taylor. The Exchange Company learns from inquiry at Holloway Jail this afternoon that Oscar Wilde is still detained there, and that his liberation is not likely to take place before Tuesday. It is generally believed that the sureties offered will be approved of, but the inquiry officials will not report before Monday next.

On Saturday evening Mr. Oscar Wilde had not been released on bail. On Saturday morning the Marquis of Queensberry visited Holloway Jail and had an interview with the officials of the prison, which is believed to have had reference to his son, Lord Alfred Douglas.

Highlighted DifferencesNot significantly similar