Compare Documents
This page compares two reports at the document level. The column on the left shows the first report and the column in the middle shows the second. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two documents. Pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage shows the percentage of similarity between the two documents.
The Thames Advertiser - Friday, May 3, 1895
London, May 2.
The summing up of Justice Sir Arthur Charles was in favour of the prisoners Wilde and Taylor, and His Honor emphasised the fact that several of the witnesses for the prosecution were undoubted blackmailers.
Later.
The jury disagreed and were discharged. Bail was, however, refused to accused.
Evening Post - Thursday, May 2, 1895
London, 30th April.
In the Wilde-Taylor case, Taylor swore that he was absolutely innocent of the charge brought against him.
Sir Edward Clarke, counsel for the accused, made an eloquent address to the jury, in which he claimed an acquittal on the ground that the chief witness for the prosecution was a man of questionable reputation.
The Judge sums up to-morrow.
(Received May 2, 10.45 a.m.)
The jury in Wilde and Taylor's case disagreed, and were discharged. Bail was refused the accused.