Compare Documents
This page compares two reports at the document level. The column on the left shows the first report and the column in the middle shows the second. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two documents. Pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage shows the percentage of similarity between the two documents.
The Boston Globe - Tuesday, May 21, 1895
LONDON, May 21 - The trial of Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Old Bailey court this morning.
Taylor was called to the stand and repeated the statements he made in the witness box at his previous trial. In reply to questions in regard to the visitors at his rooms, Taylor asked to be allowed to write their names.
The judge said: "If the names are written I will read them aloud. I do not approve of mystery."
The judge, in summing up the evidence, directed the jury to acquit Taylor as regarded his complicity with the young man, Wood, leaving them to decide upon the three charges in which Taylor is alleged to be directly guilty.
The jury retired at 3.25 p m.
The marquis of Queensberry occupied a seat in the court in the forenoon.
Taylor did not write the names, but mentioned a few which have already been connected with the case.
There were no notable names among them.
After the libel trial of Wilde against Lord Queensberry the latter’s solicitor, he said, had asked him to make a statement against Wilde, but this he had refused to do. He admitted that he had written a letter to the man Mason, signing himself "With love."
The evidence was concluded with Taylor's testimony and counsel began their addresses to the jury.
Taylor was found guilty on several counts in the indictment.
The court deferred sentence.
The Sun - Wednesday, May 22, 1895
LONDON, May 21. - The trial of Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Old Bailey Court this morning. The Marquis of Queensberry was present. Taylor was called to the stand and repeated the statements he made in the witness box at his previous trial. In reply to questions in regards to the visitors to his rooms, Taylor asked to be allowed to write their names. The Judge said: "If the names are written I will read them aloud. I do not approve of mystery."
Taylor did not write the names, but mentioned a few which have already been connected with the case. There were no notable names among them. He denied that he had gone through a marriage ceremony with a man named Mason.
After the libel trial of Wilde against Lord Queensberry, the latter’s solicitor, he said, had asked him to make a statement against Wilde, but this he had refused to do. He admitted that he had written a letter to the man Mason, signing himself "with love."
The evidence was concluded with Taylor's testimony, and counsel began their addresses to the jury.
The Judge, in summing up the evidence, directed the jury to acquit Taylor as regarded his complicity with the young man Wood, leaving them to decide upon the three charges in which Taylor is alleged to be guilty. The jury retired at 3:25 PM.
When the jury returned to the court room and had been polled , the foreman said that they could not agree that the prisoner had procured Charles Parker for Wilde, nor that Wilde had committed acts of indecency with Parker. They, however, found Taylor guilty on two counts in regard to Charles and William Parker.
Taylor's sentence was deferred until a verdict should be reached in the trial of Wilde, which will begin to-morrow.