Compare Documents
This page compares two reports at the document level. The column on the left shows the first report and the column in the middle shows the second. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two documents. Pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage shows the percentage of similarity between the two documents.
The New York Times - Thursday, April 25, 1895
LONDON, April 24. -- Counsel for Oscar Wilde made application in the Old Bailey Court this morning for a postponement of his client's trial.
Taylor's counsel wished to proceed, and the prosecuting lawyer argued in opposition to postponement. The court fixed Friday as the day for trial.
The sale of Oscar Wilde's effects by auction upon the order of the Sheriff is regarded as an indication that his pecuniary means are exhausted.
The Toronto World - Thursday, April 25, 1895
London, April 24.—Counsel for Oscar Wilde made application in the old Bailey Court for a postponement of his client’s trial. Taylor’s counsel, however, was desirous of proceeding, and the prosecuting lawyer argued in opposition to postponement, saying Wilde had had ample opportunity to prepare for trial. The court refused to grant a postponement and fixed Friday as the day for trial.
The sale of Oscar Wilde’s effects by auction upon the order of the sheriff is regarded as indicating that his pecuniary moans are exhausted.