The New York Times - Friday, May 24, 1895

LONDON, May 23. -- The trial of Oscar Wilde was resumed in the Old Bailey Court this morning. Nothing new was elicited.

The Judge dismissed Shelley's testimony as that of a witness mentally deranged.

The court then adjourned, and Wilde was again released over night on his old ball.

The Boston Globe - Tuesday, May 21, 1895

LONDON, May 21 - The trial of Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Old Bailey court this morning.

Taylor was called to the stand and repeated the statements he made in the witness box at his previous trial. In reply to questions in regard to the visitors at his rooms, Taylor asked to be allowed to write their names.

The judge said: "If the names are written I will read them aloud. I do not approve of mystery."

The judge, in summing up the evidence, directed the jury to acquit Taylor as regarded his complicity with the young man, Wood, leaving them to decide upon the three charges in which Taylor is alleged to be directly guilty.

The jury retired at 3.25 p m.

The marquis of Queensberry occupied a seat in the court in the forenoon.

Taylor did not write the names, but mentioned a few which have already been connected with the case.

There were no notable names among them.

After the libel trial of Wilde against Lord Queensberry the latter’s solicitor, he said, had asked him to make a statement against Wilde, but this he had refused to do. He admitted that he had written a letter to the man Mason, signing himself "With love."

The evidence was concluded with Taylor's testimony and counsel began their addresses to the jury.

Taylor was found guilty on several counts in the indictment.

The court deferred sentence.

Highlighted DifferencesNot significantly similar