Compare Documents
This page compares two reports at the document level. The column on the left shows the first report and the column in the middle shows the second. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two documents. Pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage shows the percentage of similarity between the two documents.
The New York Times - Saturday, May 25, 1895
LONDON, May 24. -- Upon the resumption of the trial of Oscar Wilde in the Old Bailey Court to-day, Sir Frank Lockwood, Solicitor General, made application to the Judge for the reinstatement in the case of the evidence in regard to Shelley which the court eliminated from the case yesterday. The court refused to grant the application.
Sir Edward Clarke then opened the case for the defense. He complained o f the unjust manner in which the prosecution of the case had been conducted, and declared that because of this the defendant could answer to only a remnant of the charges.
Wilde was then called to the stand, and repeated the testimony he gave in the previous trial. Wilde was physically weak and was allowed to sit while testifying.
Wilde's testimony brought out nothing new. Sir F. Lockwood, throughout his cross-examination, carefully avoided giving the defendant any opening for a literary Speech.
Sir Edward Clarke, in his speech to the Jury on behalf of Wilde, maintained that the coherent account which Wilde had given entitled his word to be accepted in preference to the allegations of a horde of blackmailers who had long been the pests of London.
Sir Francis Lockwood was addressing the jury when the court adjourned.
PARIS. May 24.--The Figaro publishes a telegram from Lord Alfred Douglas, son of the Marquis of Queensberry, demanding an apology from the paper for having alleged in its columns that he was concerned in the Piccadilly fight with the Marquis of Queensberry.
The telegram, which is dated at Rouen, adds that it was his brother and not himself who corrected his father on that occasion.
The Brooklyn Citizen - Friday, May 24, 1895
LONDON, May 24.– Upon the resumption of the trial of Oscar Wilde in the Old Bailey Court to-day Sir Frank Lockwood, Solicitor General, made application to the Judge for the reinstatement in the case of the evidence in regard to Shelley, which the Court eliminated from the case yesterday. The Court refused to grant the application.
Sir Edward Clarke then opened the case for the defence. He complained of the unjust manner in which the prosecution of the case had been conducted, and declared that because of this the defendant could answer to only a remnant of the charges.
Wilde was then called to the stand and repeated the testimony he gave in the previous trial. Wilde was physically weak and was allowed to sit while testifying.
Wilde was cross-examined by Sir Frank Lockwood, who questioned his in regard to his letter to Lord Alfred Douglas.