The San Francisco Call - Saturday, May 25, 1895

LONDON, ENG., May 24. -- There was the usual crowd at the Old Bailey courtroom to-day when Sir Edward Clarke addressed the jury in behalf of Oscar Wilde, charged with serious misdemeanors.

Wilde was called to the witness-box and given a chair, as he seemed to be broken down. In answer to questions he related how he had been on terms of intimacy with the Marquis of Queensberry's family for years, and entirely denied the charges made against him.

Sir Frank Lockwood, solicitor-general, at the conclusion of the address of Sir Edward Clarke, began a severe cross-examination of the defendant, which lasted over an hour.

Sir Edward Clarke briefly re-examined Wilde and then made his final address to the jury, asking them to save the defendant from the ruin of his reputation, which, he added, had been nearly quenched by the torrent of prejudice in the press. [Applause.]

Sir Frank Lockwood followed for the prosecution, but he had barely begun his address when the court was adjourned for the day.

The Marquis of Queensberry is quoted as saying: "I do not wish to see Wilde further punished. He has suffered enough. I only want to keep the beast from my son. Every one knows Wilde is no better than Alfred Taylor." Asked as to what he thought would be the verdict, he said: ''I am willing to forfeit 1000 to 1 that Wilde is acquitted. There are many names back of this thing."

The Cincinnati Enquirer - Saturday, May 25, 1895

LONDON, May 24.—There was the usual crowd of people in the Old Bailey Courtroom when Sir Edward Clarke addressed the jury in behalf of his client, Oscar Wilde, who is charged with serious misdemeanors. Among those present was Lord Douglass of Hawick, the eldest son of the Marquis of Queensberry.

Sir Edward Clarke, at the commencement of his speech, complained of the treatment to which Wilde had been subjected, and said that the defense might well be excused for not putting the defendant in the witness box again, "broken and unfit for the ordeal as he now is."

But, continued Sir Edward, the defense had resolved to do so.

Shortly afterward Wilde was called to the witness box, and was provided with a chair, as he seemed to be utterly broken down. Wilde, in answer to the questions put to him, related how he had been on terms of intimacy with the Marquis of Queensberry's family for years, and entirely denied the charges against him.

Sir Frank Lockwood, Solicitor-General, at the conclusion of the address of Sir Edward Clarke, began a severe cross-examination of the defendant, which lasted over an hour. The accused said that Lord Alfred Douglas was now in Paris, where he went three weeks ago at his request. Wilde, it appeared, was in constant communication with Lord Alfred.

When Wilde was asked about the famous letters which he had written to Lord Alfred Douglas, and which were read at the first trial, the defendant said it was a beautiful way in which an artist would write to a cultured young man.

Taking up the letter which Wilde had written to Lord Alfred praising his "red, rose-leaf lips" and "slim gilt soul," that walked "between poetry and passion." Sir Frank asked the defendant whether he considered this letter to be decent. Wilde replied: "Decency does not come into the question."

"Do you understand the meaning of the word?" asked counsel sternly. "Yes," replied Wilde.

Sir Frank Lockwood then closely examined the defendant regarding his relations with Lord Alfred Douglas, as to how it came to pass that they occupied adjoining rooms, &c.

Wilde admitted that he had made repeated visits to the rooms of Alfred Taylor, where he met a number of young men.

Wilde also admitted his intimacy with other young men whose names were mentioned during the previous trial.

Sir Edward Clarke briefly re-examined Wilde and then made his final address to the jury, asking them to save the defendant from the ruin of his reputation, which, he added, had been nearly quenched by the torrent of prejudice in the press. [Applause.]

Sir Frank Lockwood followed for the prosecution, but had barely begun his address when the Court was adjourned for the day.

Highlighted DifferencesNot significantly similar