Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Advertiser - Saturday, May 25, 1895
The Advertiser - Saturday, May 25, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The South Australian Chronicle - Saturday, May 25, 1895
The South Australian Chronicle - Saturday, May 25, 1895
Difference
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., M.P., who appears for Wilde on his third trial for indecency, asked the judge not to send on the Savoy Hotel case
to the jury, but his Honor Mr. Justice Mills[sic] said a sense of duty prevented him from withdrawing this portion of the case from the jury.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., M.P., who appears for Wilde on his third trial for indecency, asked the judge not to send on the Savoy Hotel
case to the jury, but his Honor Mr. Justice Mills said a sense of duty prevented him from withdrawing this portion of the case from the jury.
Mr. Judge dismissed the count of indecency against Wilde in connection with the alleged accomplice Shelley on the ground that Shelley's
evidence lacked support and that it had been proved that he frequently suffered from delusions. Sir Alfred Mills[sic] added that he considered that there
was nothing unnatural in the friendship between the two men, and that the evidence which had been adduced did not go to prove that it was otherwise than
perfectly honorable.
Mr. Judge dismissed the count of indecency against Wilde in connection with the alleged accomplice Shelley on the ground that Shelley's
evidence lacked support and that it had been proved that he frequently suffered from delusions. Sir Alfred Mills added that he considered that there was
nothing unnatural in the friendship between the two men, and that the evidence which had been adduced did not go to prove that it was otherwise than
perfectly honorable.