Original paragraph in
The Age - Thursday, May 23, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Boston Globe - Tuesday, May 21, 1895
Difference
The hearing of the charge of criminal immorality against the man Taylor, who is associated with Oscar Wilde, terminated this afternoon.
The verdict of the jury in the Wilde-Taylor case says that the prisoner Taylor had been proved by the evidence to have been twice guilty of indecency.
On the charges of procuration, the jury disagreed.
The jury stated that they had not been able to agree on the question whether Taylor and Wilde had committed indecency together.
The judge deferred sentence.
The court deferred sentence.
At the conclusion of th hearing of the charge against Taylor, Sir E. Clarke, Q.C., M.P., appearing for Oscar Wilde, proposed that the charge against Wilde should be immediately proceeded with.
The Solicitor-General, Sir F. Lockwood, Q.C., M.P., at once rose to strongly protest against such a course being adopted. He had, he angrily declared, fully expected that some similar request to this would be made on behalf of the defence, who were seeking to unfairly avail themselves of the position arising out of the method allowed in this case, in permitting the accused to be tried separately.
The judge interposed, and announced that he would take the charge against Wilde on the following day.
For the trial of Wilde a fresh jury will be impannelled.
The trial of Wilde is proceeding to-day. The case for the Crown comprises charges of criminal indecency with Taylor, Parkes, Woods and Shelby.
The Marquis of Queensberry is attending the court during the trial.
The marquis of Queensberry occupied a seat in the court in the forenoon.
The evidence given against Wilde by the witnesses for the prosecution remains unshaken by cross-examination.