Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Australian Star - Friday, April 5, 1895
The Australian Star - Friday, April 5, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Telegraph - Monday, April 8, 1895
The Telegraph - Monday, April 8, 1895
Difference
With reference to the London libel action reported by cable yesterday, in which the Marquis of Queensberry is the accused and Osoar Wilde
the prosecutor, a telegram from London to an American paper says:—John Shelto Douglas, Marquis of Queensberry, was arraigned before Magistrate Newton in
the Great Marlborough-street Police Court on March 2 on a charge of having libelled Mr. Oscar Wilde. Mr. Wilde's lawyer, in presenting the case, set forth
that Mr. Wilde was a husband who was living upon most affectionate terms with his wife and two sons. For the last nine or ten months, he said, the Marquis
of Queensberry had persecuted Mr. Wilde with the utmost cruelty.
[In connection with the case just concluded, in which Mr. Oscar Wilde withdrew his case, a telegram from London to an American paper says:
John Sholto Douglas, Marquis of Queensberry, was arraigned before Magistrate Newton in the Great Marlborough street Police Court on March 2 on a charge of
having libelled Mr. Oscar Wilde. Mr. Wilde's lawyer, in presenting the case, set forth that Mr. Wilde was a husband who was living upon most affectionate
terms with his wife and two sons. For the last nine or ten months, he said, the Marquis of Queensberry had persecuted Mr. Wilde with the utmost cruelty.
The last act of persecution occurred on February 28, when the Marquis left Wilde, at a club of which both he and Mr. Wilde are members,
an open card upon the back of which was written a vile epithet. The porter of the club, upon reading the words, enclosed the card in an envelope so that
it might not be seen by other persons than Wilde.
The last act of persecution occurred on February 28, when the Marquis left Wilde, at a club of which both he and Mr. Wilde are members, an
open card upon the back of which was written a vile epithet. The porter of the club, upon reading the words, enclosed the card in an envelope so that it
might not be seen by other persons than Wilde.
The detective who arrested the Marquis at Dover testified that when he approached the Marquis and informed him of the complaint upon
which he was arrested, his Lordship said, "This has been going on for two years."
The detective who arrested the Marquis at Dover testified that when he approached the Marquis and informed him of the complaint upon which
he was arrested, his lordship said, "This has been going on for two years."
Sir George Lewis, the Marquis of Queensberry's solicitor, in his address to the court, said that when the facts became fully known it
would be found that the Marquis had been acting under the influence of great indignation, based upon abundant provocation. The Marquis was released on
£1400 bail, and the case was adjourned for a week.
Sir George Lewis, the Marquis of Queensberry's solicitor, in his address to the court, said that when the facts became fully known it
would be found that the Marquis had been acting under the influence of great indignation, based upon abundant provocation. The Marquis was released on
£1,400 bail, and the case was adjourned for a week.
It has not been a secret that the reason for the Marquis of Queensberry's resentment was to be found in intimate relations existing
between Mr. Wilde and Lord Alfred Douglas, who, until the death of Lord Drumlanrig, placed him, next in succession, was the younger son of the Marquis.
Owing to the friendship existing between Wilde and Lord Alfred the latter became estranged from his father, who, feeling his position more acutely by
reason of sundry reports concerning the nature of their relations—which are also common property—conceived a most violent antipathy to Mr. Wilde.
It has not been a secret that the reason for the Marquis of Queensberry's resentment was to be found in intimate relations existing
between Mr. Wilde and Lord Alfred Douglas, who, until the death of Lord Drumlanrig placed him next in succession, was the younger son of the marquis.
Owing to the friendship existing between Wilde and Lord Alfred the latter became estranged from his father, who, feeling his position more acutely by
reason of sundry reports concerning the nature of their relations — which are also common property — conceived a most violent antipathy to Mr. Wilde.]