Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Brisbane Courier - Friday, April 5, 1895
The Brisbane Courier - Friday, April 5, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Ashburton Guardian - Saturday, April 6, 1895
The Ashburton Guardian - Saturday, April 6, 1895
Difference
The trial of the Marquis of Queensberry on a charge of criminally libelling Mr. Oscar Wilde was commenced to-day, and created a great
sensation, the court being thronged by an immense crowd of people.
Mr. Oscar Wilde declared that he had paid heavy blackmail to recover some "gushing" letters he had written to Lord Alfred Douglas, the
son of the Marquis, and which letters had been found in Lord Alfred's old clothes when they were given away. The defence that the Marquis was justified in
leaving the alleged libellous card with the hall porter at Mr. Wilde's club with a view to bringing matters to a head, and, as he stated, saving his son,
was based on the revelations said to be contained in these letters.
Mr. Wilde, after giving his evidence, was subjected to a stringent cross-examination with a view to showing that his book, "The Picture
of Dorian Gray," and certain articles published in the magazine "Chameleon," with which he was connected, were inspired by criminal practices. Mr. Wilde,
however, insisted that they were merely an expression of the artistic faculty; and, further, that his letters to Lord Alfred Douglas were prose poems - of
an extraordinary character, perhaps, but not justifying any immoral interpretation. He admitted that he gave one of the alleged blackmailers £21, and
entertained him at lunch afterwards in a private room. He also admitted that he had been on terms of intimacy with two lads who were not his social
equals, and he gave them considerable sums of money and expensive presents because he liked them.
Mr. Wilde's epigrams, paradoxes, and general extravagance of demeanour during the progress of the case caused much amusement in court.
The case was eventually adjourned, the Marquis of Queensberry being admitted to bail.
The case has been adjourned. The defendant has been admitted to bail.