Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Brisbane Courier - Friday, May 3, 1895
The Brisbane Courier - Friday, May 3, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Argus - Friday, May 3, 1895
The Argus - Friday, May 3, 1895
Difference
The case against Oscar Wilde and Taylor was resumed this morning, the address of the council for the accused having been concluded
yesterday.
The presiding Judge, Sir Arthur Charles, summed up in favour of the accused, and laid emphasis on the fact that several of the witnesses
for the prosecution were undoubted blackmailers.
Mr. Justice Charles, in his summing up to the jury, was on the whole favourable to the prisoners. He dwelt emphatically on the fact that
several of the witnesses for the prosecution were undoubted blackmailers.
After deliberating for some time the jury announced that they were unable to agree, and they were thereupon discharged.
The jury, after being locked up for some time, came into court and announced that they were unable to agree on a verdict. They were
accordingly discharged.
The accused will be re-tried, and meantime they were remanded to gaol, bail being refused.