Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The South Australian Register - Wednesday, May 1, 1895
The South Australian Register - Wednesday, May 1, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Adelaide Observer - Saturday, May 4, 1895
The Adelaide Observer - Saturday, May 4, 1895
Difference
The trial of Oscar Wilde and his accomplice Taylor, who were charged with conspiring together to commit a crime, and also each
separately with having committed a misdemeanour, was resumed to-day.
The trial of Oscar Wilde and his accomplice Taylor, who were charged with conspiring together to commit a crime, and also each separately
with having committed a misdemeanour, was resumed to-day.
Counsel for the Crown decided to withdraw the charge of conspiracy, and the trial is now proceeding on the misdemeanor charge.
Counsel for the Crown decided to withdraw the charge of conspiracy, and the trial is now proceeding on the misdemeanor charge.
After the Crown had submitted their evidence, Oscar Wilde entered the witness box to give evidence on his own behalf. He denied the
testimony of the witnesses for the Crown in toto, and alleged that he was the victim of a parcel of blackmailers.
After the Crown had submitted their evidence, Oscar Wilde entered the witness box to give evidence on his own behalf. He denied the
testimony of the witnesses for the Crown in toto, and alleged that he was the victim of a parcel of blackmailers.