Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The South Australian Register - Thursday, May 23, 1895
The South Australian Register - Thursday, May 23, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The South Australian Register - Saturday, May 18, 1895
The South Australian Register - Saturday, May 18, 1895
Difference
The trial of Alfred Taylor, who was alleged to have been an accomplice with Oscar Wilde in certain offences against the eleventh section
of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, was continued to-day in the Court of Queen's Bench, before His Honor Sir Alfred Mills, one of the Justices of the
Queen's Bench.
Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor, who were arraigned last month before Sir Arthur Charles for offences under the eleventh clause of the
Criminal Law Amendment Act, will again appear in the Court of Queen's Bench on Monday, when His Honor Sir Alfred Wills, one of the Justices of the Queen's
Bench, will take the case.
The Court was crowded throughout the trial, and at the conclusion of the address of counsel the Judge's summing up was listened to with
unconcealed interest.
The Jury brought in a verdict of guilty on two counts in connection with Charles William Parker, a witness for Oscar Wilde in the libel
action brought against the Marquis of Queensberry.
Sir Alfred Mills deferred passing sentence against the prisoner until the conclusion of the trial now proceeding against Oscar Wilde,
the well-known dramatist and litterateur, on similar charges.