Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Sydney Morning Herald - Saturday, April 6, 1895
The Sydney Morning Herald - Saturday, April 6, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The West Australian - Monday, April 8, 1895
The West Australian - Monday, April 8, 1895
Difference
LONDON, APRIL 5.
Oscar Wilde hurriedly left the court while counsel for the Marquis of Queensberry was explaining that the prosecutor's literature and
letters justified the plea that Wilde posed as an immoral person. Wilde withdrew in order to avoid the appalling evidence that he feared would be brought
against him by the witnesses for the defence.
The verdict of not guilty was received in court with loud cheers.
No warrant against Oscar Wilde was applied for, but Mr. Russell, solicitor for the Marquis of Queensberry, sent to the Public Prosecutor
a statement of the notes of the evidence given by witnesses during the case, with the object of preventing a miscarriage of justice.
No application has yet been made for a warrant for the arrest of Oscar Wilde, but Mr. Russell, solicitor for the Marquis of Queensberry,
has sent to the Public Prosecutor the statements of the witnesses for the defence, and the notes of the evidence, with the object, as he asserts, of
preventing any miscarriage of justice.