Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The West Australian - Friday, May 31, 1895
The West Australian - Friday, May 31, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
Taranaki Herald - Tuesday, May 28, 1895
Taranaki Herald - Tuesday, May 28, 1895
Difference
WRITING from London to a contemporary, Mr. Henry Lucy remarks - There is something dismally tragic in its way in the thought of Oscar
Wilde in his prison cell whilst two London Theatres are crammed with audiences delighted with the clever situations and light persiflage of plays from his
pen, in the full tide of their popularity when his career was abruptly cut short. The situation was a little awkward for the managers of St. James's
Theatre, where "The Importance of Being Earnest" is played, and for Messrs. Waller and Morell, who had arranged to continue at the Criterion the
successful run of "An Ideal Husband." They have attempted to meet it in a manner that is problematically wise, but indubitably mean. They keep on the
plays, but erase the name of the dishonoured author. In the United States, where "The Ideal Husband" has been played to crowded houses, the manager has
heroioally withdrawn it, a proceeding in which there is at least some sign of logic. To show one's moral indignation by omitting the name of a dishonoured
and degraded author, and to continue taking at the door the money he brings in is quite another thing. It is impossible to feel any regret at the fate
that has at length tracked the evil footsteps of Oscar Wilde. But the pity of it is infinite. After long struggling with costly habits and inadequate
means, Wilde had reached a position in which he found fortune as well as fame. His plays, running in the United States and simultaneously in two theatres
in London, brought him in large revenues. Having outlived the well considered foolishness of his lily and sunflower days, he had before him an honourable
and lucrative career. Then his sin finds him out, and all is blackness and night. The sensation created in London by the criminal proceedings is
commensurate with the wideness of the circle to which Wilde was personally known, and that included everybody worth knowing. The last time I met him at
dinner was at a small party in a private dining-room at the House of Commons. The host, heir presumptive to a peerage, an ex-Minister, belonged, like the
majority of his guests (who included Mr. Arthur Balfour), to the most exclusive set in London. Wilde, as usual amid such surroundings, was in brilliant
conversational form. In his narrow cell, or hereafter in company with the coarsest of mankind, with nothing in his dress to distinguish between them and
the sybarite, he will doubtless sometimes think of that particular evening, and of many another akin to it. The bitterest part of his punishment will be
these crowding memories, for truly "sorrow's crown of sorrow is remembering happier things."
Mr Henry W. Lucy, writing to one of the Australian papers on the subject, says:—There is something dismally tragic in its way in the
thought of Oscar Wilde in his prison cell whilst two London theatres are crammed with audiences delighted with the clever situations and light persiflage
of his plays from his pen, in the full tide of their popularity, when his career was abruptly cut short. The situation was a little awkward for the
managers of St. James's Theatre, where "The Importance of Being Earnest" is played, and for Messrs Waller and Morell, who had arranged to continue at the
Criterion the successful run of "An Ideal Husband." They have attempted to meet it in a manner that is problematically wise, but indubitably mean. They
keep on the plays, but erase the name of the dishonoured author. In the United States, where the "Ideal Husband' has been played to crowded houses, the
manager has heroically withdrawn it, a proceeding in which there is at least some sign of logic. To show one's moral indignation by omitting the name of a
dishonoured and degraded author, and to continue taking at the door the money he brings in, is quite another thing. It is impossible to feel any regret at
the fate that has at length tracked the evil footsteps of Oscar Wilde. But the pity of it is infinite. After long struggling with costly habits and
inadequate means Wilde had reached a position in which he found a fortune as well as fame. His plays, running in the United States and simultaneously in
two theatres in London, brought him in large revenues. Having outlived the well-considered foolishness of his lily and sunflower days, he had before him a
honourable and lucrative career. Then his sin finds him out, and all is blackness and night. The sensation created in London by the criminal proceedings
are commensurate with the wideness of the circle to which Wilde was personally known, and that included everybody worth knowing. The last time I met him
at dinner was at a small party in a private dining-room at the House of Commons. The host, heir presumptive to a peerage, an ex-Minister, belonged, like
the majority of his guests (who included Mr Arthur Balfour), to the most exclusive set in London. Wilde, as usual amid such surroundings, was in brilliant
conversational form. In his narrow cell, or hereafter in company with the coarsest of mankind, with nothing in his dress to to distinguish between them
and the sybarite, he will doubtless sometimes think of that particular evening, and of many another akin to it. The bitterest part of his punishment will
be these crowding memories, for truly "sorrow's crown of sorrow is remembering happier things."