Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
Bristol Mercury - Tuesday, April 30, 1895
Bristol Mercury - Tuesday, April 30, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
Dublin Evening Telegraph - Monday, April 29, 1895
Dublin Evening Telegraph - Monday, April 29, 1895
Difference
Mr Justice Charles resumed his hearing of the charges against Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor yesterday at the Old Bailey, London, there
being again a large attendance of the public.
The evidence for the prosecution was continued by the examination of shorthand writers who took notes in the case of Wilde v. Marquis of
Queensberry.
The masseur and members of the staff of the Savoy hotel were then called.
Evidence of the arrest of both prisoners was next adduced by the police.
Evidence of arrest of both prisoners was next adduced by the police.
The Clerk of the Court produced the indictment in the Wilde v. Queensberry action for libel, in which case the prosecution withdrew.
The Clerk of the Court produced the indictment, Wilde v Queensbery, for libel, in which case the prosecution withdrew.
Counsel now argued as to the reading of Wilde's deposition made as plaintiff. Finally it was agreed that Mr Gill should [...] from the
beginning of the cross-examination.
Mr A Gill took up the reading of Wilde's deposition where Mr C.F. Gill had broken off. The answers given related to the prisoner's letters
to Lord Alfred Douglas and to his denials given to suggestions respecting witnesses for the Treasury. At a later stage, replying to a formal objection
raised by Taylor's counsel, the Judge said the deposition would be considered at present as evidence against Wilde only.
The only case for the Crown having closed, his Lordship adjourned until to-morrow.