Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
Bristol Mercury - Tuesday, May 21, 1895
Bristol Mercury - Tuesday, May 21, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Morning Post - Saturday, April 27, 1895
The Morning Post - Saturday, April 27, 1895
Difference
At the Central Criminal Court, London, yesterday, before Mr Justice Wills, Oscar Wilde, 40, author, and Alfred Taylor, 33, of no
occupation, were indicted a second time for certain misdemeanours.
At the Central Criminal Court yesterday, before Mr. Justice Charles, Oscar Wilde, aged 40, author, and Alfred Taylor, aged 33, of no
occupation, were severally indicted for certain misdemeanours under the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1885.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q. C. applied that the cases of the two defendants might be taken seperately.
The Solicitor General said the results of the defendants being so tried would be that matter would have to be introduced which might be
unfair to the other defendant not on his trial.
The Judge said that, having carefully considered the matter, his notion was that the case ought to be taken seperately.
Sir Edward Clarke applied next that the case of Wilde be taken first.
The Judge said that he could not interfere with the discretion of the Solicitor General in this matter.
The Solicitor General elected to proceed with the case of Taylor first.
Sir Edward Clarke desired to make a further application, having in view the course which the Crown had taken--viz, that the trial of Mr
Wilde be taken at the next session.
The Judge said that the application had better be made at the conclusion of the case of Taylor.
The Solicitor General opened the case and evidence was taken.
Mr Grain addressed the Court on behalf of Taylor and had not concluded his speech when the Court adjourned.
Before leaving, his Lordship asked the Jury to keep an open mind on the case, and not to form any conclusion until they had heard
everything that had to be said on the case.