Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Morning Post - Thursday, May 2, 1895
The Morning Post - Thursday, May 2, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Morning Post - Wednesday, May 1, 1895
The Morning Post - Wednesday, May 1, 1895
Difference
At the Central Criminal Court yesterday, before Mr. Justice Charles, the trial was resumed of Oscar Wilde, aged 40, author, and Alfred
Taylor, aged 33, of no occupation, on an indictment charging them with certain misdemeanours.
At the Central Criminal Court yesterday, before Mr. Justice Charles, the trial was resumed of Oscar Wilde, 40, author, and Alfred
Taylor, 33, of no occupation, on an indictment charging them with certain misdemeanours.
Mr. C. F. Gill and Mr. Horace Avory prosecuted on behalf of the Treasury; Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C., Mr. Charles Mathews, and Mr. Travers
Humphreys represented Oscar Wilde; Mr. J. P. Grain defended Taylor.
Sir. C. F. Gill and Mr. H. Avory prosecuted on behalf of the Treasury; Sir Edward Clarke, Q.C, Mr. Charles Mathews, and Mr. Travers
Humphreys defended Oscar Wilde; Mr. J. P. Grain and Mr. Paul Taylor defended Alfred Taylor.
The speeches for the defence and the reply for the Crown were concluded the previous day.
Mr. Justice Charles, in summing up, commented on the importance of the case to the accused and on the gravity of the charges. No
unfavourable impression ought to be drawn from a work like "Dorian Gray," as, in his opinion, a writer ought not to be confounded with the persons he
created; nor ought the result of the Queensberry case to weigh with them in the least. The case was an important one to the community. The testimony that
had been adduced by some of the witnesses was obviously tainted evidence, and it required strong corroboration. It was a question for the Jury to decide
if there existed independent and untainted corroboration. His Lordship dismissed from consideration the literary aspects of the case, being of opinion
that Wilde was not responsible for the writings of others. If they were satisfied that the evidence supported the charges, they ought fearlessly to say so
by their verdict. Wilde was a man of high intellectual gifts and education; Taylor belonged to a good class of persons, and they might think it
unreasonable to suppose that they would have acted in the manner suggested. The Jury, however, could not disregard the evidence, and it was only upon the
evidence that their verdict ought to be determined.
The Jury retired to consider their verdict, and, after an absence of three hours and three quarters, they returned into Court, when the
foreman said that they were unable to agree to a verdict.
Sir E. Clarke asked that an acquittal be entered on the conspiracy counts, which the prosecution withdrew.
The Jury returned a formal verdict of not guilty in respect of these counts and two other counts.
Sir E. Clarke applied for bail for Wilde. He did not think that the Crown would oppose the application after what had occurred.
Mr. Clarke Hall applied for bail for Taylor.
Mr. Gill did not desire to say anything about the matter of bail.
His Lordship—I do not feel able to accede to the application.
Mr. Gill said that the case would certainly be tried again.
The Jury were discharged, and the case was ordered to stand over until the next Sessions.
The prisoners were removed in custody.