Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Standard - Saturday, April 6, 1895
The Standard - Saturday, April 6, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The West Australian - Thursday, May 16, 1895
The West Australian - Thursday, May 16, 1895
Difference
The hearing of the charge against the Marquess of Queensberry of criminally libelling Mr. Oscar Wilde was resumed yesterday morning at
the Central Criminal Court, before Mr. Justice Henn Collins. The defence was a justification of the libel.— The counsel for the prosecution were Sir E.
Clarke, Q.C., Mr. C. Mathews, and Mr. Travers Humphreys. Mr. Carson, Q.C., Mr. C. F. Gill, Q.C, and Mr. A. Gill appeared for Lord Queensberry ; while Mr.
Besley, Q.C., and Mr. Monckton watched the case for Lord Douglas of Hawick, the eldest son of the Marquess.
The public galleries were again crowded, the greatest interest being shown in the proceedings. The Judge took his seat at half-past ten.
Mr. Oscar VVilde was not present when Mr. Carson rose to resume his speech for the defence.
Mr. Carson said that at the adjournment yesterday he had dealt as fully as he intended to deal with the question of Wilde's connection
with the literature that had been produced in this case, and also with the two letters that had been read, and he almost hoped that he had sufficiently
demonstrated upon these matters, which were not really in dispute, that Lord Queensberry was absolutely justified in bringing to a climax, in the way that
he did, the question of the connection between Mr. Oscar Wilde and his son. He had, unfortunately, a more powerful part of the case now to approach. It
would be his painful duty to bring before the Jury those young men, one after another, to tell their tale. It was, of course, even for an advocate, a
distasteful task ; but let those who were inclined to condemn these men for allowing themselves to be dominated, misled, and corrupted by Oscar Wilde
remember the relative position of the two parties, and that they were men more sinned against than sinning. He was not going in great detail to criticise
the evidence of Wilde with regard to the several transactions as to which he cross-examined him. There was a general observation applicable to all the
cases There was a startling similarity between each of them, on Wilde's own admission, which must lead the Jury to draw the most painful conclusions.
There was the fact that in not one of those cases were the parties upon an equality with Wilde in anyway. They were not educated parties such as he would
naturally associate with, they were not his equal in years, and there was a curious similiarity between the ages of each of them. Mr. Wilde said that
there was something beautiful and charming about youth that led him to adopt the course he did. but was he unable to find more suitable companions who
were at the same time young among the youths of his own class ? The thing was absurd. His excuse in the box was only a travesty of what was the reality of
the matter. Who were these younp men ? They were out of employment, and of their antecedents Wilde professed to know nothing. All of them were from 18 to
20 years of age, or thereabouts, and in the manner of their introduction to Wilde and his subsequent treatment of them all were in the same category,
leading to the same conclusion, that there was something unnatural and what might not ordinarily be expected in the relations between them. Parker was a
gentleman's servant out of employment. He and his brother were in a restaurant in Piccadilly and were met by Taylor, and when a day or two later Wilde
gave Taylor a dinner on his birthday, telling him to bring any friends he liked, what an idea he must have had of Wilde's taste when he brought a groom
and a valet ! If that one fact was true — and the main features had been admitted by Wilde — why did Taylor speak to those young men at all, and why did
he bring them to dine with Wilde ? There could be no explanation of these matters but the one that Tavlor was the procureur for Wilde. They would hear
from Parker, when he came to tell his unfortunate story, that he was poor, out of place, and fell a victim to Wilde. He would tell them that on the first
evening they met Wilde addressed him — the valet — as Charlie, and that he addressed this distinguished dramatist, whose name was being spoken everywhere
in London as the author of a most successful play, as Oscar. He did not wish to say anything about Wilde's theories of putting an end to social
distinctions. It might be a very noble and generous instinct in some people to wish to level down all social barriers ; but one thing that was plain in
this case was that Wilde's conduct was not regulated by any very generous instincts towards these young men. If he wanted to assist Parker was it of
benefit for a man in Wilde's position in society and literature to take him to a magnificent dinner and prime him with the best champagne ? All the
ridiculous excuses of Wiide would not bear a moment's examination. Wilde pretended that the whole of these dinners and lunches were mere generous actions
on his part. He gave no explanation of why he had that suite of rooms at the Savoy Hotel. It was a large hotel, and Wilde had no difficulty in taking
Parker into his rooms, where he treated him with whiskies and sodas, and some of that iced champagne which his doctor forbade Wilde to have. There had
been no open scandal at the Savoy Hotel ; but a man could not live that kind of life without gossip going abroad and reports being circulated in the
circles in which he mixed. After they heard the evidence from the Savoy Hotel they would wonder, not that the gossip reached Lord Queensberry's ears, but
that the man Wilde had been tolerated for years in Society as he had. He referred to the youth Parker, who was coming there with the greatest reluctance,
and was now earning for himself a good character in the Country, and Wilde's dealings with the boy Conway.
Mr. Carson was proceeding when Sir E. Clarke spoke to him, and they consulted for a moment.
Sir Edward Clarke then said :— Will your Lordship allow me to interpose and make a statement, which is, of course, made under a feeling
of very grave respon-sibility. My learned friend Mr. Carson yesterday addressed the Jury upon the question of the literature involved in this case, and
upon the inferences to be drawn from admissions made with regard to the letters read yesterday. My learned friend began his address by saying that he
hoped the need of having the Jury deal with those details could be avoided. I think it must have been present to your mind that the representatives of Mr.
Oscar Wilde have beFore them in this case a very terrible anxiety. They could not conceal from themselves the inferences which might be drawn might not
improperly induce the Jury to say that when Lord Queensberry used the words "posing as" he was using words which there was a sufficient justification for
a father to use. That in our view might not he an improbable result of that part of the case. I and my learned friends who are with me had to look forward
to this — that a verdict given in favour of the Defendant upon that point might be regarded as a finding with regard to all parts of the case. The
position we stood in was that, in view of the finding of a verdict, we would be going through long evidence dealing with matters of a most appalling
character. In these circumstances, I hope your Lordship will think I am taking the right course or action. Having regard to what has been already said in
respect of the literature and of the letters, I feel that I could not resist a verdict of Not Guilty in this case — not guilty, that is, having reference
to the words "posing as." In these circumstances, I hope your Lordship will think that I am not going beyond the bounds of duty, and that I am doing
something to save and to prevent what would be a most terrible task, however it might close, if I now interpose to say that, on behalf of Mr. Oscar Wilde,
I would ask to withdraw from the prosecution. If your Lordship does not think that at this time of the case, and after what has taken place, I ought to be
allowed to do this, I am prepared to submit to a verdict of Not Guilty, having reference — if to any part of the particulars — to that part of the
particulars which is connected with the publication of "Dorian Gray" and with the publication of the Chameleon. I trust, my Lord, that that may make an
end of the case.
Mr. Carson. — I do not know that I have any right whatever to interfere in any way in the application my learned friend has made. I can
only say, as far as Lord Queensberry is concerned, that if there is a plea of Not Guilty — a plea which involves that he has succeeded in his complete
justification — I am quite satisfied. Of course, my learned friend would admit that we must succeed on that plea in the manner in which he has said, and,
that being so, it will rest entirely with your Lordship as to whether the course suggested by my learned friend ought to be taken.
Mr. Justice Collins. — Inasmuch as the Prosecutor in this case is prepared to acquiesce in a verdict of Not Guilty against the Accused, I
do not think it is any part of the function of the Judge or of the Jury to insist on going into details which can have no bearing on the matter which is
already concluded by the assent of the Prosecutor. But as for putting any limitation on the verdict, the justification is one which is a justification of
the charge of "posing as." If that is justified it is justified, and if it is not it is not, and the verdict of the Jury upon it must be Guilty or Not
Guilty. As I understand, the Prosecutor will assent to a verdict of Not Guilty. There can be no terms. There can be no limitation of the verdict, which
must be Guilty or Not Guilty. I understand the Prosecutor to assent to a verdict of Not Guilty, and of course the Jury will return a verdict of Not
Guilty.
Mr. Carson.— The verdict will be that complete justification is proved, and that the publication was for the public benefit.
The Judge.— The verdict will be Not Guilty, but it is arrived at by that process of course. I shall have to tell the Jury that the
justification was proved, and that it was true in substance and in fact that the Prosecutor had "posed as." And I shall also have to tell them that they
will have to find that the statement was published in such a manner as to be for the public benefit. If they find on these two points the verdict will be
Not Guilty.
A few seconds later the Judge, turning to the Jury, said : Your verdict will be Not Guilty ; but there are other matters which have to
be determined with reference to the specific finding of complete justification, and as I told you, that involves that the statement is true in fact and
that the publication is for the public benefit. These are the facts on which you will have to find, and if you find them in favour of the Defendant, your
verdict will be Not Guilty. You will have to say whether you find complete justification has been proved or not.
The Jury without leaving the box signified in a few minutes that they had arrived at their decision.
The Clerk of Arraigns.— Do you find the complete justification proved or not ?
The Foreman of the Jury.— Yes.
The Clerk.— Do you find a verdict of Not Guilty ?
The Foreman. — Yes.
The Clerk.— And that is the verdict of you all ?
The Foreman. — Yes ; and we also find that the pub- lication was for the public benefit.
The verdict was received with applause, of which the Judge took no notice and becoming known in the streets, there was a demonstration
of approval on the part of a large crowd.
Mr. Carson.— The costs will follow. May I ask that Lord Queensberry should be discharged.
The Judge. — Certainly.
Lord Queensberry then left the dock and came into the well of the Court, where he received the congratulations of his friends.
Mr. Oscar Wilde, who had been in consultation with his counsel in the vicinity of the Court, left the Old Bailey a few minutes before
Sir Edward Clarke made his withdrawal. He drove in his carriage, drawn by a pair of horses, to the Holborn Viaduct Hotel, where he has lunched daily
during the trial. Here Mr. Wilde, Lord Alfred Douglas, Mr. Wilde's solicitor, and one or two other gentlemen remained for some time in consultation. When
they left he drove in a brougham to the West-end.
After the close of the case, the following letter was addressed by Mr. Charles Russell, the Marquess of Queensberry's solicitor, to the
Public Prosecutor : —
"37, Norfolk-street. Strand. " Dear Sir,— In order that there may be no miscarriage of justice. I think it my duty at once to
send you a copy of all our Witnesses' statements, together with a copy of the shorthand notes of trial. — Yours faithfully, "Charles Russell."
Immediately after the House of Commons met yesterday, a representative of the Public Prosecutor had an interview with the Home
Secretary, the Attorney General, and the Solicitor General in regard to the case of Mr. Oscar Wilde. It was at once agreed that a warrant should be
applied for, and Mr. Asquith gave instructions that, wherever Wilde might be found, he should be stopped.
There was a great deal of excitement at the Bow- street Police-court yesterday afternoon in consequence of a report that a warrant would
be applied for for the arrest of Mr. Oscar Wilde. Sir John Bridge was the presiding Magistrate, having taken the place of Mr. Vaughan early in the
morning. When Sir John Bridge took his seat after the luncheon interval, Mr. Angus Lewis, of the Treasury, intimated that he would like to speak to him
privately. Sir John assented, and the Magistrate and Barrister carried on a whispered conversation for a few minutes. What actually took place did not
transpire, but it was understood that Mr. Lewis intimated to Sir John Bridge that he might have an important application to make to him later in the
afternoon. Detective Inspector Brockwell was also in attendance. With him were two youths whose names figured prominently in the Wilde v. Queensberry
case. Sir John Bridge did not return to the Court after disposing of the summonses, but it is understood that he saw Mr. Angus Lewis, Mr. C. F. Gill, and
Mr. Charles Russell in his private room, and afterwards granted a warrant for the arrest of Mr. Oscar Wilde.
The arrest was made by Inspector Richards last evening at the Cadogan Hotel, Sloane-street, to which place Mr. Wilde drove after leaving
the Holborn Viaduct Hotel. The Inspector, who had with him Sergeant Allen, made the arrest about half-past six o'clock. On the senior officer asking for
Mr. Wilde he was told he was not there ; but on the Inspector insisting, he was conducted to his room. Mr. Wilde had with him two friends, and the
Inspector stated the object of his visit. Mr. Wilde made no reply, and the party at once drove to Scotland-yard to meet Inspector Brockwell, who had the
warrant for the arrest. The warrant was read to the Prisoner, who made no reply, and after some delay he was taken to Bow-street Police-station, arriving
there at 8.10 in a four-wheel cab. Mr. Wilde, who was the first to alight, walked straight into the station followed by the detectives. He was dressed in
a long black frock coat, dark trousers, and silk hat, and did not appear in the slightest way to be affected by the circumstances of his position. He was
at once placed in the dock, and stood there with his hands in his pockets while the charge was taken down by Inspector Digby. When the charge had been
entered Mr. Wilde was escorted to the cells.
Shortly after the Prisoner's arrival at Bow-street a friend of Mr. Wilde, drove up with a small gladstone bag, containing a change of
clothes and other necessaries for Mr. Wilde, but, after a short interview with the inspector on duty, that gentleman returned to his cab with the bag, not
being allowed to leave it. Later on Lord Alfred Douglas visited Bow-street to see if he could bail out Mr. Wilde, and appeared much distressed when he was
informed that on no consideration could his application be entertained. He then offered to procure extra comforts in the shape of bedding for his friend,
but this offer was also refused by the officer on duty. Mr. Wilde occupies an ordinary cell, but will be allowed to supply himself with any extra food he
thinks fit. He will be brought up this morning at tea o'clock at Bow-street Police-station.
The Marquess of Queensberry states that as soon as the trial ended yesterday, he sent this message to Mr. Oscar Wilde : — " If the
country allows you to leave, all the better for the country, but if you take my son with you, I will follow you wherever you go and shoot you."
The Central News says: - "Lord Queensberry states that as soon as the trial ended on April 5th he sent this message to Mr. Wilde: - "If
the country allows you to leave all the better for the country; but if you take my son with you I will follow you wherever you go and shoot you."