Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
Manitoba Morning Free Press - Thursday, April 4, 1895
Manitoba Morning Free Press - Thursday, April 4, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Boston Post - Thursday, April 4, 1895
The Boston Post - Thursday, April 4, 1895
Difference
London, April 3 — The Central Court was densely packed today to hear the proceedings in the action brought by Oscar Wilde against the
Marquis of Queensberry for libel. Wilde was present and maintained an air of unconcern. The Marquis of Queensberry pleaded not guilty, adding that the
so-called libel was true, and made known in the interests of public morality.
Sir Edward Clarke for the prosecution reviewed the evidence, dwelling upon the writing on the card which constituted the libel. When
the counsel said certain witnesses would deny the marquis’ testimony, the marquis made an attempt to attack Wilde but could not get at him. The counsel
said the Marquis of Queensberry had openly libeled Mr. Wilde in the latter’s own house and was put out. Counsel admitted that Wilde had written an
extravagant letter to Lord Douglas. The latter was read and it contained such expressions as "Your rose-leaf lips," "Your slim, gilt soul walks between
poetry and passion," "I know that Hyacinthus, who was loved by Apollo was you in the Greek days."
Wilde then took the stand and detailed at length his relations with the family of the marquis.
Mr. Wilde was then called to the stand, and detailed his relations with the family of the marquis.
Wilde said that in 1893 Queensberry came to his house and accused him of having taken rooms for the latter’s son, Lord Douglas, and
threatened to thrash Wilde, if he again caught him with his son. Wilde denied he had taken rooms for Douglas. On cross-examination, Wilde admitted
stopping with Douglas and other young men at hotels.
He denied that he had "madly adored" a man twenty years his junior. In regard to his productions he said he did not believe any of his
books had affected the conduct of its readers.
The Marquis of Queensberry is being tried as an ordinary citizen, before a judge and a jury, for his offence in connection with his
alleged libel of Oscar Wilde. This is due to the fact that criminal libel is not a felony, but a misdemeanor, and the only privilege which the marquis
enjoys, if he chooses to exercise it, is the right to wear his hat in court, a favor denied to all other persons under the penalty of being imprisoned for
contempt.
The last occasion on which it was exercised was when the Earl of Abingdon was tried for libel and sentenced to imprisonment and fine.
Were the charge against Lord Queensberry that of felony instead of mere misdemeanor, the ordinary courts would have no jurisdiction over him, and his
trial would take place in the House of Lords, where his fellow-peers would be his judges, their president for the time being the lord chancellor, or the
lord steward of the Queen’s household, who at the present is the Marquis of Breadalbane. During a trial of this kind the president is invariably addressed
by the counsel as "Your Grace." The peers taking part in the proceedings are not sworn, but pronounce the verdict of guilty or not guilty "upon their
honor," the peer of most recent creation and of lowest rank being the first to give his vote. The verdict of the majority prevails.