Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
Manitoba Morning Free Press - Thursday, May 2, 1895
Manitoba Morning Free Press - Thursday, May 2, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
Daily Times - Wednesday, May 1, 1895
Daily Times - Wednesday, May 1, 1895
Difference
London, May 1 — In the Old Bailey court today Justice Charles summed up the case against Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor. The justice in
so doing said that counselor for the prosecution acted wisely in withdrawing the charge of conspiracy brought against Wilde, as he, Justice Charles, would
have ordered the jury to bring in a verdict of "not guilty" on that specification. He admitted that there was corroboration of the witnesses, but the
jury, he added, would have to weigh the characters of men like Parker, Wood and Atkins, whom Sir Edward Clarke, in the justice’s opinion, properly
described as blackmailers. The justice also urged the jury not to be influenced by Wilde’s writings, saying that many great men had written indecently.
The jury must exercise their own judgment as to whether Wilde’s letter to Lord Alfred Douglas evidenced an unnatural passion and he also said, the
relations between Shelly and Wilde would be an interesting matter for the jury’s judgment. The jury retired at 1.30 p. m.
London, May 1.— In Old Bailed to-day Justice Charles summed up the case against Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor. The justice in doing so
said that the counsel had acted wisely in withdrawing the charge of conspiracy brought against Wilde, as he, Justice Charles, would have ordered the jury
to bring in a verdict of not guilty on that specification. He admitted that there was corroboration of witnesses, but the jury, he added, would have to
weigh the characters of men like Parker, Wood and Atkins, whom Sir Edward Clarke, in the justice’s opinion, properly described as black-mailers. The
justice also urged the jury not to be influenced by Wilde’s writings, saying that a great many men had written indecently. The jury must exercise their
own judgement as to whether Wilde’s letters to Lord Alfred Douglas breathed an unutterable passion, and he also said the relations between Sheely and
Wilde would be an interesting matter for the jury’s judgement.
Later — The Wilde jury disagreed.