Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
Quebec Morning Chronicle - Tuesday, April 30, 1895
Quebec Morning Chronicle - Tuesday, April 30, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
New-York Tribune - Tuesday, April 30, 1895
New-York Tribune - Tuesday, April 30, 1895
Difference
London, April 20 — The trial of Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, today. A number of
letters written by the prisoners to young Maver and others were read. The judge said he had received a letter a from a distinguished literary man
expressing sympathy with Wilde and hoping that the charges against him would be disproved. Mr. C.F. Gill, who was Commoner Carson’s assistant counsel in
the defense of the Marquis of Queensberry, proceeded to read the evidence taken in the Queensberry trial relating to Wilde’s association with Alphonse
Conway, a newsboy at Worthington. Sir Edward Clarke, on behalf of Wilde, objected to the reading on the ground that the matter was outside the present
inducement. The Court declined to interfere and also refused to exclude evidence regarding Wilde’s relations with his fellow prisoner Taylor. The case for
the prosecution closed with today’s testimony.
London, April 29. - The trial of Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor was resumed in the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, today. Several
letters written by the prisoners were read. The Judge said he had read a letter from a distinguished literary man expressing sympathy with Wilde and hope
that the charges against him would be disproved. C.F. Gill, assistant counsel in the defence of the Marquis of Queensberry, proceeded to read some of the
evidence taken in the Queensberry trial. Sir Edward Clarke, on behalf of Wilde, objected to the reading on the ground that the matter was outside the
present indictment. The Court declined to interfere, and also refused to exclude evidence regarding Wilde's relations with Taylor. The case for the
prosecution was closed with to-day's testimony.