Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Gazette - Thursday, May 23, 1895
The Gazette - Thursday, May 23, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
Quebec Morning Chronicle - Thursday, May 23, 1895
Quebec Morning Chronicle - Thursday, May 23, 1895
Difference
LONDON, May 22.—The second trial of Oscar Wilde for unnatural practices, began in the Central Criminal court, Old Bailey, this morning.
Wilde, upon entering court, was accompanied by but one of his sureties, the Rev. Stuart Headlam, his other bondsman, Lord Douglas of Hawick, being engaged
in the Marlborough street Police court. Wilde looked pale and haggard, evidently being greatly affected by the result of the trial of Taylor yesterday.
Sir Frank Lockwood, Q.C., M.P., conducted the prosecution. The case had not been concluded when the court rose.
London, May 22 — The second trial of Oscar Wilde for unnatural practices began in the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, this morning.
Wilde, upon entering the Court, was accompanied by but one of his sureties, Rev. Mr. Headlaw ; his other surety, Lord Douglas of Hawick, being engaged in
the Marlborough . Street Police Court. Wilde looked pale and haggard, evidently being greatly affected by the result of the trial of Taylor yesterday. Sir
Frank Lockwood, Q. C., M.P., conducted the prosecution. The alleged offences charged against Wilde, he said in his opening address, occurred between
February, 1892, and October, 1893. He laid especial stress on the charge in which Wilde was involved with Shelly. Alfred Wood and Charles Parkes were
called to the stand and repeated the testimony previously given by them, after which the Court adjourned.