Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Ottawa Citizen - Saturday, April 27, 1895
The Ottawa Citizen - Saturday, April 27, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Washington Post - Saturday, April 27, 1895
The Washington Post - Saturday, April 27, 1895
Difference
London, April 20.- Men and women twenty deep, filled the corridors of the Old Bailey, before ten o'clock and fought vainly for standing
room near the vantage - the door through which the prisoners Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor must enter the court.
The counsel for the prosecution were early to their places. The jury, composed of intelligent appearing middle-aged tradesmen, was
polled at 10.20 a.m., and a few minutes later Wilde and Taylor were escorted into court and placed in the prisoners' dock.
Wilde was dressed as faultlessly as upon his former appearance in court, but his face was drawn and haggard, his hair had been cut and
his swaggering nonchalant air had entirely disappeared.
Justice Charles opened court at 10.25 a.m., and a lengthy discussion followed as to whether the prisoners should be tried on all the
twenty-five separate counts of the indictment.
Sir Edward Clarke, Q C, counsel for the defence, objected to such a course, but the judge overruled him.
The prisoners then pleaded not guilty.
Mr. C. F. Gill, on behalf of the Treasury, opened the case for the prosecution, reciting the known history of the case, dwelling upon
the association of Wilde with Taylor and giving a graphic description of Taylor's darkened perfumed rooms, where Wilde was in the habit of meeting his
masculine intimates. Counsel went in detail through the various charges, reviewing all the testimony which has already been presented.
Charles Parker was the first witness. His testimony was most revolting, but the judge held it to be necessary that the charges against
Wilde should explained in detail.
Taylor maintained his air of unconcern.
It was no wonder that Wilde looked uncomfortable; for the evidence given by young Parker was vastly more disgusting than the testimony
he gave at the hearings in the Bow Street Police court. Upon cross-examination he swore that the Wood and Allen lads of the same stripe as himself had
received £400 blackmail from a gentleman with whom they were guilty of misconduct in the gentleman's lodgings and that he himself has received £30 from
the same person, for the same reason.
The evidence given by the young man Parker was vastly more disgusting than the testimony he gave at the hearings in the Bow street
police court. Upon cross-examination he swore that Wood and Allen had received £400 blackmail from a gentleman with whom they were guilty of misconduct in
the gentleman’s lodgings, and that he himself had received £30 from the same person for the same reason.