Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Ottawa Citizen - Thursday, May 23, 1895
The Ottawa Citizen - Thursday, May 23, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The San Francisco Examiner - Thursday, May 23, 1895
The San Francisco Examiner - Thursday, May 23, 1895
Difference
London, May 22.- The second trial of Oscar Wilde for unnatural practices began in the Central criminal court, Old Bailey. this morning.
Wilde, upon entering court, was accompanied by one of his sureties, the Rev. Stuart Headley, his other bondsman, Lord Douglas of Hawick, being engaged in
the Marlborough street police court. Wilde looked pale and haggard, evidently greatly affected by the result of the trial of Taylor yesterday.
LONDON, May 22. - The second trial of Oscar Wilde began to-day and will be continued to-morrow. After the adjournment this afternoon
Wilde was released overnight on his old bail. Wilde, upon entering court to-day, was accompanied by but one of his sureties, Rev. Stewart Headlam, his
other bondsman, Lord Douglas of Hawick, being engaged in Marlborough-street Police Court in defending himself against the charge of disorderly conduct.
Wilde looked pale and haggard as he entered the dock, evidently greatly affected by the adverse result of the trial of his companion, Taylor, yesterday.
Sir Frank Lockwood, Q.C., M.P., conducted the prosecution. The alleged offences charged against Wilde, he said in his opening address
occurred between February, 1892 and October, 1893. He laid special stress upon the charge in which Wilde was involved with Shelly.
Sir Frank Lockwood, Q.C., M.P., conducted the prosecution. The offenses charged against Wilde, he said in his opening address, occured
between February, 1892 and October, 1893. He laid special stress upon the charge in which Wilde was involved with Shelley. Mr. Lockwood thought the jury
should accept the prosecution's evidence as regarded Wilde’s mode of life at the Savoy Hotel.