Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Toronto World - Thursday, April 4, 1895
The Toronto World - Thursday, April 4, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The Atlanta Constitution - Thursday, April 4, 1895
The Atlanta Constitution - Thursday, April 4, 1895
Difference
London, April 3.—At the Central Criminal Court trial of the action of Oscar Wilde against the Marquis of Queensberry for libel was
begun.
The Marquis of Queensberry entered the dock, and pleaded not guilty, adding that the so-called libel was true, and had been made known
in the interest of public morality.
The marquis of Queensberry entered the dock and, in answer to the usual questions, pleaded not guilty, adding that the so-called libel
was true and had been made known in the interest of public morality.
Sir Edward Clarke reviewed the evidence taken in the Police Court, dwelling upon the writing on the card, which constituted the libel
complained of. This writing alleged that Mr. Wilde had been posing immorally. The case was not concluded.
Sir Edward Clark, in opening the case, reviewed the evidence taken in police court, dwelling upon the writing on the card which
constituted the libel complained of. This writing alleged that Wilde had been posing immorally.