Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
Galignani Messenger - Friday, April 12, 1895
Galignani Messenger - Friday, April 12, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
London Star - Thursday, April 11, 1895
London Star - Thursday, April 11, 1895
Difference
LONDON, April 11.
There was the same crush and struggle to get into the court at Bow-street this morning as on Saturday. Long before ten o'clock a large
crowd gathered outside the entrance doors, and though a few went in when the doors were opened to get an early place at the locked iron wicket guarding
the stairway to the little court upstairs, the great majority waited outside to greet the arrival of the accused. The prison van drew up about twenty
minutes to eleven o'clock, and the great mass of people booed loudly. The two prisoners, closely guarded, were hurried within the building.
Following the offer of his services to Mr. Wilde, Sir Edward Clarke, who wore a summery grey frock coat, and a general air of Easter
vacation, put in an early appearance to conduct Wilde's defence. Mr. Travers Humphreys was with him. Against them as before was Mr. C.F. Gill, instructed
by Mr. Angus Lewis, of the Treasury. To-day Taylor was represented by Mr. Arthur Newton. At 11.10 Sir John Bridge took his seat upon the Bench, and the
two prisoners were ordered to be put into the dock, but so dense was the crowd that the police had difficulty in clearing a passage. Before Wilde appeared
he could be heard asking, "Is Sir Edward Clarke here?" "Yes," replied the Sergeant-Gaoler, and Wilde strode heavily into the dock, with a slight bow
towards the bench. He looked paler and less plethoric than last week, the change in his appearance being markedly for the better. He still wore the dark
grey great coat with a velvet collar and cuffs, and as soon as possible sat down in the extreme corner of the dock, his elbow on the iron rail and his
head on his hand.
Sir Edward Clarke, in announcing his intention not to cross-examine, said cross-examination would probably not influence the result so
far as that court was concerned--the prisoner must be committed--and it was desirable on every ground to shorten the proceedings as much as possible.
Sir Edward Clarke, in announcing his intention not to cross-examine, said cross-examination would probably not influence the result so far
as that court was concerned--the prisoner must be committed--and it was desirable on every ground to shorten the proceedings as much as possible.
Mr. Newton pointed out that his client, who is only charged with conspiring with Wilde, stood on a rather different ground, which made it
desirable to cross-examine some of the witnesses in his behalf.
with Wilde, stood on a rather different ground, which made it desirable to cross-examine some of the witnesses in his behalf.
The lad Charles Parker was first recalled. He was respectably dressed, in apparently new clothes. He denied that he was introduced to
Taylor by a man named Harrington, and adhered to his statement that Taylor first accosted him in a restaurant. He recognised, he said, the peril of
prosecution in which he himself stood, but he denied with an air very like that of honest indignation that he had been guilty of improprieties before he
met Wilde. He declared that he knew nothing of its being Taylor's birthday on the occasion when he was first taken to dine with Wilde. He knew the man
Atkins who was mentioned at the Old Bailey in connection with the blackmailing letters, but he knew him only as a comedian, and not as a notorious
blackmailer who lived by accusations against gentlemen. He left his own employment as valet because the gentleman could not afford to keep him. He was
afterwards accused of stealing the master's clothes. He was arrested in the Fitzroy-square raid last year, but he declared he only knew one other man
concerned in that little adventure. That was Taylor. Then Mr. Newton touched a more serious point.
The lad Charles Parker was first recalled. He was respectably dressed, in apparently new clothes. He denied that he was introduced to
Taylor by a man named Harrington, and adhered to his statement that Taylor first accosted him in a restaurant. He recognised, he said, the peril of
prosecution in which he himself stood, but he denied with an air very like that of honest indignation that he had been guilty of improprieties before he
met Wilde. He declared that he knew nothing of its being Taylor's birthday on the occasion when he was first taken to dine with Wilde. He knew the man
Atkins who was mentioned at the Old Bailey in connection with the blackmailing letters, but he knew him only as a comedian, and not as a notorious
blackmailer who lived by accusations against gentlemen. He left his own employment as valet because the gentleman could not afford to keep him. He was
afterwards accused of stealing the master's clothes. He was arrested in the Fitzroy-square raid last year, but he declared he only knew one other man
concerned in that little adventure. That was Taylor. Then Mr. Newton touched a more serious point.
Just before that did you get £30, in conjunction with two other persons, by threatening to accuse a gentleman of a crime? I didn't. The
others gave it to me. Then it was hush money? I don't know that. Sir John Bridge: Isn't that substantially what it was? I don't know what they
gave it to me for. They only told me who it came from.
Frederick Atkins, a pale-eyed, pimply-faced lad of 20, in a green cord waistcoat with pale blue spots, a blue oxford shirt and a jacket
of rough brown tweed, was the next witness. He deposed that he first knew the prisoner Taylor and the establishment at Little College-street. Taylor
introduced him to Wilde in November, 1893, when all three, and another man--one of the Nameless Men of the Old Bailey proceedings--dined together at the
Florence Hotel in Soho. Wilde asked witness if he would like to go to Paris with him as his private secretary. He said "Yes," and they went two days
later, by the Club Train from Victoria. Arrived in Paris, they went to 29, Boulevards des Capucines. Next day they lunched at the Cafe Julien, and in the
afternoon went to the Grand Hotel to have their hair out. Wilde spoke in French to the barber, who began to curl witness' hair. It will be remembered that
Wilde's version of this incident is that the lad wanted to have his hair curled, and he forbade him. They dined together, "the best dinner I ever had in
my life," said the witness, and afterwards Wilde gave him a louis and permission to go out and amuse himself.
"To go to the Moulin Rouge?" suggested Mr. Gill. "No," said the witness. "He told me not to go there. But I went." Wilde gave him
the usual cigarette case and £3 when they got back to Victoria. Mr. Gill reverted to the dinner at the Florence, and the witness mentioned as parts of
Wilde's table manners that he kissed the waiter, and put his arms round the necks of witness and Lord Alfred Douglas.
and £3 when they got back to Victoria. Mr. Gill reverted to the dinner at the Florence, and the witness mentioned as parts of Wilde's
table manners that he kissed the waiter, and put his arms round the necks of witness and Lord Alfred Douglas.
Mr. Newton had not much to ask this witness in cross-examination. "Don't mention any name," he said, "but were you not introduced to
Taylor by the gentleman who was in Paris?" Yes. Did not that gentleman also introduce you to Mr. Wilde? No. Sir John Bridge: Did you do any
secretarial work for Wilde in Paris? Witness: Yes; I wrote something about the "Woman of No Importance."
Among the few people of some importance who were among the crowd in court during the morning were Sir Augustus Harris and Mr. Jerome J.
Jerome.
Among the few people of some importance who were among the crowd in court during the morning were Sir Augustus Harris and Mr. Jerome J.
Jerome.
The next witness was a tall, heavy-framed young fellow, with a distinctly "intellectual face," as Wilde said of him at the Old Bailey.
This was Edward Shelley, the young clerk who was employed by Elkin Mathews and Co. at the Bodley Head, where he made Wilde's acquaintance. In spite of the
stifling closeness of the court he wore a heavy double-breasted reefer overcoat, tightly buttoned. It was over the retail book counter that he first saw
Wilde, who was at the Bodley Head about the publication of one of his books, and the acquaintance was encouraged by presents of Wilde's works and an
invitation to dinner at the Albermarle, where the witness too so much wine that he became excited. Witness admired Wilde's works, and he always professed
to be fond of Shelley, and Wilde flattered him and said he was clever.
as Wilde said of him at the Old Bailey. This was Edward Shelley, the young clerk who was employed by Elkin Mathews and Co. at the Bodley
Head, where he made Wilde's acquaintance. In spite of the stifling closeness of the court he wore a heavy double-breasted reefer overcoat, tightly
buttoned. It was over the retail book counter that he first saw Wilde, who was at the Bodley Head about the publication of one of his books, and the
acquaintance was encouraged by presents of Wilde's works and an invitation to dinner at the Albermarle, where the witness took so much wine that he became
excited. After dinner, in a private sitting room, they had more to drink, and afterwards Wilde said, "Will you come into my room?" "I didn't know what the
man was," the witness said. "I only thought he was going to put me up for the night. I admired his works, and he always professed to be fond of me, and
flattered me. He said I was clever."
All this Wilde heard with an inscrutable countenance, the inevitable suede gloves hanging from the fingers which supported his large
fleshy face, and his eyes blankly fixed on the wall behind the magistrate.
All this Wilde heard with an inscrutable countenance, the inevitable suede gloves hanging from the fingers which supported his large
fleshy face, and his eyes blankly fixed on the wall behind the magistrate.
Shelley went on to describe visits to Kettner's, the Cafe Royal, the Independent Theatre, and other places in the company of Wilde. He
had destroyed all the letters he had received from Wilde, he said, and had torn out the inscribed title-pages from the books which were given to him.
to Kettner's, the Cafe Royal, the Independent Theatre, and other places in the company of Wilde. He had destroyed all the letters he had
received from Wilde, he said, and had torn out the inscribed title-pages from the books which were given to him. But he had kept the books. Wilde asked
him to go to Paris with him, but he was not able to get off.
The other witnesses who were called last week were not now present, and therefore could not be cross-examined.
The other witnesses who were called last week were not now present, and therefore could not be cross-examined. Mr. Gill therefore passed
on to
Mrs. Lucy Rumsby, a stout old lady in a plush mantle and a crape bonnet, is landlady at 50, Park-walk, Chelsea, and for a fortnight
Charles Parker occupied a small room in her house. At the end of that time she gave him notice in consequence of a complaint made by another lodger.
Mrs. Margery Bancroft, who lives in the house, added that Taylor, who at the time lived at No. 3, Chapel-street--which is just round the
corner--sometimes called for Parker. On one occasion, late at night, a cab drew up at the door, and she saw Parker and Oscar Wilde alight.
Both prisoners were ordered to stand up, and Mrs. Bancroft stated positively that she recognized them both. Taylor smiled a sickly
smile. Wilde was impassive and superior. Mrs. Bancroft added that she had her suspicions, and it was on her complaint that Parker was sent away.
Mrs. Gray, another landlady, gave similar evidence. She let two rooms to Taylor, from August to the end of 1893, and had seen both
Parker and Wilde there. Parker had stayed all night. When Taylor went away he left behind a box of papers, which the witness had handed over to Mr.
Russell, Lord Queensberry's solicitor. Taylor never seemed to have any occupation, and had not many callers. Perhaps two or three young men had called at
different times. She knew nothing about the Little College-street establishment.
Mrs. Gray, the landlady of 3, Chapel-st, gave similar evidence. She let two rooms to Taylor, from August to the end of 1893, and had seen
both Parker and Wilde there. Parker had stayed all night. When Taylor went away he left behind a box of papers, which the witness had handed over to Mr.
Russell, Lord Queensberry's solicitor. Taylor never seemed to have any occupation, and had not many callers. Perhaps two or three young men had called at
different times. She knew nothing about the Little College-street establishment.
Mr. Vogel, proprietor at the Hotel Albemarle, Piccadilly, proved that Wilde stayed there in March, 1892, for one night, in October of
the same year, and on a third occasion in April, 1893. At the latter date witness took note of the young men who visited Wilde. From what he observed it
was his desire and intention that Wilde should not come back to the hotel again. Witness pressed him for payment through his solicitors, so that he should
not come to the hotel again.
Inspector Brockwell deposed that when Wilde was handed over to his custody he read over the warrant to him. Wilde put out his hand and
said, "Let me read it." The inspector said, "No, I can't do that. If there is anything you don't understand I will read it to you again." Wilde then asked
what dates were mentioned, and the witness told him, "March 20, 1893, and divers other days." He was searched, and on him were found letters and
memoranda, and three writs. Among the papers were an envelope adressed "Sidney Mavor, Esq.," and a pencilled note, 'Dear Sid,--I could not wait any
longer. Come on at once to see Oscar. 16, Tite-street, Chelsea. I am there,--Yours, ALFRED TAYLOR." Two of the writs were by jewellers, for jewellery and
cigarette cases.
There was another note from Taylor to Wilde, referring to Inspector Littlechild, the retired police officer, who prepared the evidence
for the Marquis of Queensberry's case. "Dear Oscar," Taylor wrote, "When I left home yesterday I left a note for Sidney Mavor. Littlechild called shortly
afterwards, and, saying he wished to write a note, got into my room. I found on getting back that the note to Mavor had been opened. In its place was one
from Littlechild saying he wished to see me next morning."
The court adjourned for a few minutes for lunch.
The Court adjourned for a few minutes for lunch.
If it is true that Wilde is so ingrained a poseur that he regards his present position with complacent self-satisfaction there is at
least no trace of it in his manner. Without wearing the look peculiar to people who are described as "feeling their position" he betrays no consciousness
of the inquisitive scrutiny of the crowd. Not a shade of emotion or anxiety appeared on his face all day. Taylor's bearing towards him is almost
obsequious, but the two never speak, nor exchange any sign of intelligence.
After lunch Sarah Applegarth, an intelligent servant girl who had been employed at Atkins's lodgings, deposed that she had seen Wilde
there. Another young man named Barford was also present at one of these meetings.
Thomas Price, a nervous, fair-haired young man, deposed that he was waiter at No. 10, St. James's-place, which is a private hotel. Wilde
took rooms there--bedroom and sitting-room communicating--in October, 1893, and kept them till April, 1894. Young men visited him there. Wilde only slept
in the rooms occasionally.
Sergeant Harris, of the A (Westminster) Division, deposed that in consequence of communications made to the police he kept observation
on 13, Little College-street, in May, 1893. One one occasion he obtained admission to Taylor's room. The windows were always closed, and were heavily
draped within. The staircase and even the walls of the rooms were draped, and strongly perfumed. This officer arrested Taylor at 25, Denbigh-street. He
was so far from exhibiting the surprise that he said, "I expected you last night."
Mr. Newton suggested in cross examination that Taylor had been in attendance at the Old Bailey throughout the trials.
Wood, the lad who had given £30 by Wilde that he might go to America, was recalled, and denied that he had had money from Taylor.
Examined by Mr. Newton, he said he was alone at the Cafe Royal when he first met Wilde.
A clerk in the employ of Thornhill and Co., silversmiths, produced an order for a cigarette case given to the lad Mann, and this
concluded the evidence with which Mr. Gill was prepared to-day. Counsel said he did not anticipate having to take up much time at the next hearing.
Strong applications for bail were made on behalf of both prisoners. Mr. Newton urged that all the evidence against Taylor was that of
discredited persons, and he was a member of a thoroughly respectable family, who were willing to provide bail.
Sir John Bridge refused to entertain the application in respect of either prisoner and remanded both in custody till Friday week.