Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
Galignani Messenger - Tuesday, April 30, 1895
Galignani Messenger - Tuesday, April 30, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
London Star - Monday, April 29, 1895
London Star - Monday, April 29, 1895
Difference
London, April 29.
The proceedings did not commence this morning till 11 o'clock. A half-hour's grace was allowed, so as to give time for those engaged in
the case who were out of town for the week end to get back by train. Mr. Justice Charles is an exceedingly punctual judge. Precisely at 11 that quaint Old
Bailey signal of his lordship's approach, the slamming of the bar at the door, announced his arrival. Alderman Lawrence again accompanied his lordship,
and took Lord Mayor's chair beside the judge's seat.
Wilde and Taylor when put into the dock resumed the chairs awaiting them. Wilde promptly seated himself, and at once took up what is
apparently his favourite position, his elbow on the corner of the dock rail and his head resting on his palm or on his knuckles. Taylor gazed around the
court before sitting down, and seemed looking for someone. Then he spoke to his solicitor, and took his chair, smiling, of course--he still is always
smiling. Wilde appeared somewhat better this morning. The rest of yesterday has evidently been grateful to him. His colour is better, and his eyes
brighter; but he still looks ill and terribly aged by the events of the past three weeks.
Counsel were all in their accustomed places, Mr. C. F. Gill and Mr. Horace Avory, with Mr. Angus Lewis and Mr. Frayling, of the Treasury,
who instruct them, for the prosecution; Sir Edward Clarke, Mr. Charles Mathews, and Mr. Travers Humphreys, with Mr. Robert Humphreys, Wilde's solicitor,
for Wilde's defence ; Mr. J. P. Grain for the defence of Taylor; Mr. Kershaw watching for that superior young man, the witness Mavor.
Mr. J. P. Grain set the case going again by asking the judge to confirm his impression that young Shelley of the intellectual face had
said the prisoner Taylor was a stranger to him.
Mr. J.P. Grain set the case going again by asking the judge to confirm his impression that young Shelley of the intellectual face had
said the prisoner Taylor was a stranger to him.
Mr. Justice Charles quoted from his notes: "Taylor is a stranger to me."
Mr. Justice Charles quoted from his notes, "Taylor is a stranger to me."
Two shorthand writers formally proved the transcript of Wilde's evidence at the Queensberry libel trial. It was the sublimation of
limited editions -- three copies, large paper, MS., one for the prosecution, one for the defence, and one for the judge.
of Wilde's evidence at the Queensberry libel trial. It was the sublimation of limited editions--three copies, large paper, M.S., one for
the prosecution. one for the defence, and one for the judge.
Antonio Miggz, a dark little Frenchman, who in March, 1893, was employed as a masseur at the Savoy Hotel, gave evidence as to Wilde's
stay at the hotel.
Antonin Miggz, a dark little Frenchman, who in March, 1893, was employed as a masseur at the Savoy Hotel, gave evidence as to Wilde's
stay at the hotel.
Ellen Cotter, a chambermaid at the hotel, deposed to seeing a boy in Wilde's room on another occasion. Wilde occupied room 362. Lord
Alfred Douglas was in 361. The boy was in Wilde's room. Mrs. Perkins, who in March, 1893, was housekeeper at the Savoy Hotel, confirmed Miss Cotter's
statement.
Ellen Cotter, a chambermaid at the hotel, deposed to seeing a boy in Wilde's room on another occasion, Wilde occupied room 362. Lord
Alfred Douglas was in 361. The boy was in Wilde's room. Mrs. Perkins, who in March, 1893, was housekeeper at the Savoy Hotel, confirmed Ms. Cotter's
statement.
Passing from this portion of the case, Mr. C. F. Gill called
Passing from this portion of the case, Mr. C.F. Gill called
William Harris, a detective sergeant, who obtained access by a subterfuge to Taylor's rooms at 13, Little College-street, in May, 1893.
He described the interior of the draped and artificially-darkened rooms. It was this officer who arrested Taylor at Denbigh-street, Pimlico, on the
present charge. When taken into custody he only said: "Very well. I expected you last night. What are you going to do with me?" The witness took him to
Bow-street, where be was charged.
William Harris, a detective sergeant, who obtained access by a subterfuge to Taylor's rooms at 14, Little College-st., in May, 1893. He
described the interior of the draped and artificially-darkened rooms. It was this officer who arrested Taylor at Denbigh-st., Pimlico, on the present
charge. When taken into custody he only said, "Very well, I expected you last night. What are you going to do with me?" The witness took him to Bow-st.,
where he was charged.
Mr. Grain's cross-examination was directed to show that the prisoner made no attempt to evade arrest, and had been in attendance on
subpoena at the Old Bailey throughout the Queensberry case. The witness could not remember Taylor saying he had heard a warrant was out, and was on his
way to give himself up. Mr. Grain was also anxious to show that the darkening of Taylor's windows at Little College-street was only the drapery usual in
Continental cities and the modern flat. Harris would express no opinion about Continental cities, but he had never seen anything of the kind in England
before. The muslin, he said, was not made into blinds, but was tightly stretched over the whole of the windows.
Taylor saying he had heard a warrant was out, and was on his way to give himself up. Mr. Grain was also anxious to show that the
darkening of Taylor's windows at Little College-st. was only the drapery usual in Continental cities and the modern flat. Harris would express no opinion
about Continental cities, but he had never seen anything of the kind on England before. The muslin, he said, was not made into blinds, but was tightly
stretched over the whole of his windows.
Detective-inspector Richards described again the arrest of Wilde at the Cadogan Hotel, Sloane-street, on the evening of the 5th inst.,
after the collapse of the case against Lord Queensberry.
Detective inspector Richards describes again the arrest of Wilde at the Cadogan Hotel, Sloane-st., on the evening of the 5 inst., after
the collapse of the case against Lord Queensberry. When Wilde heard the charge he asked, "Where shall I be taken," and seemed
It was Inspector Brockwell who held the warrant and actually charged Wilde, who, after ascertaining the dates to which the charges
referred, made no further comment. He was searched in the usual way. Among his papers was an envelope addressed to "Sidney Mavor, Esq.," containing a note
as follows: "Dear Sid,--I could not wait any longer. Come on at once and see Oscar at 16, Tite-street, Chelsea; I am there.--Yours, ALF. TAYLOR." There
was another letter from Taylor to Wilde, informing him that ex-Inspector Littlechild, Lord Queensberry's agent, had obtained admission to his rooms, and
that he had found a letter opened which he had left there for Mavor.
It was Inspector Brockwell who held the warrant and actually charged Wilde who, after ascertaining the dates to which the charges
referred, made no further comment. He was searched in the usual way. Among his papers was an envelope addressed to "Sidney Mavor, Esq.," containing a note
as follows: "Dear Sid,--I could not wait any longer. Come on at once and see Oscar at 16, Tite-street, Chelsea; I am there.--Yours, ALF. TAYLOR." There
was another letter from Taylor to Wilde, informing him that ex-Inspector Littlechild, Lord Queensberry's agent, had obtained admission to his rooms, and
that he had found a letter opened which he had left there for Mavor.
Other letters were found on Wilde which, Mr. Gill submitted, had no bearing on the case. Sir Edward Clarke was anxious that one of them
at least should be read, and it was first handed to his lordship. He presently stated that it seemed to be a sympathetic letter from a literary friend of
the defendant. He did not quite see what bearing it had on the case, or the other letters which had been read.
Other letters were found on Wilde which, Mr. Gill submitted, had no bearing on the case. Sir Edward Clarke was anxious that one of them
at least should be read, and it was first handed to his lordship. He presently stated that it seemed to be a sympathetic letter from a literary friend of
the defendant. He did not quite see what bearing it had on the case, or the other letters which had been read.
Sir Edward said those other letters had no doubt been read with the object of producing some impression on the mind of the jury, and
this letter should be admissible for the same purpose.
His lordship, however, pointed out that if a letter expressing adverse views had been found on Wilde, it would have been said it would
be wrong to read it to the jury.
His lordship, however, pointed out that if a letter expressing adverse views had been found on Wilde, it would have been said it would
be wrong to read it to the jury.
Sir Edward did not press his application.
Sir Edward did not press his application.
Mr. Read, clerk of the court, gave formal evidence of the nature of the indictment in Wilde's charge against the Marquis of Queensberry,
and of the collapse of the case on the third day of the trial, when the prosecutor assented to a verdict of not guilty.
Mr. Read, clerk of the court, gave formal evidence of the nature of the indictment in Wilde's charge against the Marquis of Queensberry,
and of the collapse of the case on the third day of the trial, when the prosecutor assented to a verdict of not guilty. It next became a question of
reading to the jury the
It next became a question of reading to the jury the evidence of Wilde himself at the trial of Lord Queensberry, and Sir Edward Clarke
objected that only the cross-examination, which foreshadowed Lord Queensberry's plea of justification, had any bearing on the present charges, which were
in no way referred to in Mr. Wilde's examination-in-chief.
Sir Edward Clarke objected that only the cross-examination, which foreshadowed Lord Queensberry's plea of justification, had any bearing
on the present charges, which were in no way referred to in Mr. Wilde's examination-in-chief.
Mr. Gill held that the following questions and answers at the end of the examination-in-chief were pertinent:-"Your attention has been
called to the statements which are made in the pleadings referring to different persons and impugning your conduct with them ? Answer: Yes. Question: Is
there any truth whatever in any of these accusations? Answer: There is no truth whatever in any one of them." This, and the whole of Wilde's cross-
examination, which runs to folios innumerable, Mr. Gill proceeded to read to the jury.
Mr. Gill held that the following questions and answers at the end of the examination-in-chief were pertinent: - "Your attention has been
called to the statements which are made in the pleadings referring to different persons and impugning your conduct with them? Answer: Yes. Question: Is
there any truth whatever in any of these accusations? Answer: There is no truth whatever in any one of them." This, and the whole of Wilde's
cross-examination, which runs to folios innumerable, Mr. Gill proceeded to read to the jury, a task which promised to last till far into the afternoon,
and to make it absolutely impossible to finish the case to-day.
For the first time Wilde began to show uneasiness as counsel rapidly, and with a minimum of expression, ran through the wonderful series
of Oscarisms which made up a day and a half of cross-examination unparalleled in the history of the Old Bailey. There was now an intolerable irony in such
flippancies and paradoxes as made amusing reading when Wilde was in the witness-box. As a refuge from the ghosts of his own intellectual fireworks Wilde
took to playing with a quill pen. He has grown perceptibly thinner since his incarceration. Taylor seemed profoundly bored, and rested his arm on the
ledge of the dock and his mouth on his hand in an attitude peculiar to himself.
When the court adjourned for lunch Mr. C. F. Gill had only got through the literary side of the cross-examination, and at two o'clock he
was relieved by Mr. A. Gill, who went on with the reading, making an even worse hash of the passages about the slim-gilt soul, and the "red rose-leaf
lips, made no less for the music of song than for the madness of kissing."
When the court adjourned for lunch Mr. C. F. Gill had only got through the literary side of the cross-examination, and at two o'clock he
was relieved by Mr. A. Gill, who went on with the reading, making an even worse hash of the passages about the slim-gilt soul, and the "red rose-leaf
lips, made no less for the music of song than for the madness of kissing."
At half-past two Mr. A. Gill reached his seventy-third folio, and Mr. C. F. Gill again took up the running. Wilde's description of
Taylor is worth recording: "I do not call him an intimate friend. He was a friend of mine."
There was a small diversion when Sir Edward Clarke objected to the reading of certain parts of the cross-examination which did not
concern the subject-matter of the present charges. But Mr. Gill said he was using the cross-examination as part of his own case, and in its relation to
the general credibility of Wilde in his denial of the charges of misconduct. His lordship upheld this view, and Mr. Gill went on with his reading of the
Worthing incident, and the history of the "happy idle nature" of Alphonse Conway.
When the reading came to the question of the relations between Wilde and Taylor, Mr. Grain rose to object that Wilde's cross-examination
in another case should not be made evidence against his client.
Mr. Justice Charles said he could not exclude it on that ground. It was evidence against Wilde, and that made it legal to read it.
Whether it was also evidence against Taylor depended on a number of considerations, which he would take care were not lost sight of.
The remainder of the afternoon was occupied in reading the evidence of the various unreportable depositions, the lawyers occasionally
intervening to discuss some technical points, and at 4.30 the court adjourned until tomorrow morning.
It is said that the Scotland Yard authorities have decided to prosecute the publishers of certain ribald ballads on the Wilde case which
have been circulated throughout the metropolis, especially in South London.