Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Dublin Evening Mail - Tuesday, May 7, 1895
The Dublin Evening Mail - Tuesday, May 7, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
The New York Herald (European Edition) - Wednesday, May 8, 1895
The New York Herald (European Edition) - Wednesday, May 8, 1895
Difference
London, Tuesday.The expected application for Mr Oscar Wilde’s release on bail was made at Bow street this morning before Mr
Vaughan. Mr Travers Humphreys appeared on behalf of the prisoner, while the Treasury was represented by Mr Argus Lewis. Mr Humphreys briefly recapitulated
the history of the case up to the application made yesterday to Baron Pollock, and said he was now prepared with the necessary sureties. Both of them were
persons of substance, and their names had been submitted to and approved by the Treasury. One was the Rev Stewart Headlam, and the other Lord Douglas of
Hawick. Both these gentlemen were called and swore that they were worth £1,250, the amount of bail fixed for each surety by Baron Pollock. Mr Vaughan said
he was perfectly satisfied with the bail tendered, and he ordered Wilde’s immediate release.
Mr Stewart Headlam, interviewed by a Press Association representative at the close of the proceedings as to his reason for becoming
surety, said—"I have undertaken this responsibility on public grounds. I felt that the public mind had been prejudiced before the case began, and I was
anxious to give Mr Wilde any help I could to enable him to stand his trial in good health and spirits."
Wilde looked brighter and not much worse for his incarceration. The Rev. Stewart Headlam, in an interview as to his action, says: "I
have undertaken this responsibility on public grounds. I felt that the public mind has been prejudiced before the case began, and I anxious to give Mr.
Wilde any help I could to enable him to stand his trial in good health and spirits."
At the close of the hearing to-day Lord Douglas of Hawick, and the Rev Stewart Headlam, accompanied by one of Messrs Humphrey’s clerks,
entered a cab and drove to Holloway Gaol, where, after Mr Oscar Wilde has entered into his own recognisances before the Governor of the prison, he will be
at once released.
Oscar Wilde left Holloway Gaol this afternoon.