Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
Evening Herald - Saturday, May 25, 1895
Evening Herald - Saturday, May 25, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
Sunday World - Sunday, May 26, 1895
Sunday World - Sunday, May 26, 1895
Difference
The trial of Oscar Wilde was resumed at the Old Bailey to-day before Mr Justice Wills. The prisoner, who looked ill and anxious, having
entered the dock, the Solicitor-General resumed his speech in reply for the prosecution. He asked what was the relationship of the prisoner with Lord
Alfred Douglas, and said though Lord Queensbery resented the intimacy between the prisoner and Lord Alfred, the prisoner continued the intimacy and
flaunted Lord Alfred at hotels in London and the country. He contended that it had been shown that the prisoner was closely intimate with Taylor.
The prisoner looked ill and anxious in the morning when the Court resumed. As soon as he had entered the dock the Solicitor-General
resumed his speech for the prosecution. He asked what was the relationship of the prisoner with Lord Alfred Douglas? Though Lord Queensberry resented the
intimacy between the prisoner and Lord Alfred, the prisoner continued that intimacy and flaunted Lord Alfred at hotels in London and the country. The
learned counsel contended it had been shown that the prison was closely intimate with Taylor.
Sir Edward Clarke said that was not borne out by evidence.
Sir Edward Clarke said that was not borne out by evidence.
The Solicitor-General said that it appeared as if counsel for the defence desired that one man should go down and another be saved
because of a false glamour of art.
The Solicitor-General said it appeared as if counsel for the defence desired that one man should go down, and another be saved because of
a false glamour of art.
Sir Edward Clarke protested against this mode of appeal to the jury.
Sir Edward Clarke protested against this mode of appeal to the jury.
The Solicitor-General next referred to the letter which referred to the "rose leaf lips and madness of kissing." The jury were tried to
be put off with the story that this was a prose poem which they could not appreciate. They must thank God they could not. They could only appreciate it at
its proper level which was somewhat lower than a beast's. His learned friend had warned the jury lest by their verdict they should enable blackmailing to
rear its head unblushingly in this country, but they should take care that they did not enable another vice as detestable and abominable to raise its head
unblushingly. The jury must believe the evidence of Parker and Wood, because no motive had been shown why they should deceive them. He submitted that the
conflict of testimony only happened at the point where admission stopped and actual confession commenced. ln conclusion he asked the jury to observe the
oath they had taken.
The Solicitor-General next referred to the letter which spoke of "rose-leaf lips and madness of kissing." The jury were tried to be put
off with the story that this was a prose-poem which they could not appreciate. They must thank God they could only appreciate it at its proper level,
which was somewhat lower than a beast’s. His learned friend had warned the jury lest by their verdict they should enable blackmailing to rear its head
unblushingly in this country. They should take care that they did not enable another vice as detestable and abominable to raise itself unblushingly. The
jury must believe the evidence of Parker and Ward, because no motive had been shown why they should deceive. He submitted that a conflict of testimony
only happened at the point where admission stopped and actual confession commenced. In conclusion, he asked the jury to observe the oath they had taken.
His Lordship, in summing up, thought that Wilde had not suffered by Taylor being tried first. With regard to Wood's case, he regretted
that he must deal with matters affecting Lord Alfred Douglas, who was not a party to these proceedings and could not get evidence—
The Judge, in summing up, said he thought Wilde had not suffered by Taylor being tried first. With regard to Wilde’s case, he regretted
he must deal with matters affecting Lord Alfred Douglas, who was not a party to these proceedings, and could not give evidence.
A juror—He could be here.
His Lordship said he could not volunteer to give evidence. With regard to the letters referred to, it was for the jury to say whether
they pointed to unclean relations and appetites on both sides. Lord Alfred Douglas was the person who sent Wood to Wilde, and the jury had to consider
whether that introduction was for the purpose of charity or for a wicked purpose.
His Lordship said he could not volunteer to give evidence. With regard to the letters referred to it was for the jury to say whether they
pointed to unclean relations and appetites on both sides. Lord Alfred Douglas was the person who sent Wood to Wilde, and the jury had to consider whether
that introduction was for purposes of charity or for wickedness.
The foreman of the jury said they were anxious to know whether the warrant for the arrest of Lord Alfred Douglas had ever been issued?
The Foreman of Jury said they were anxious to know whether a warrant for the arrest of Lord Alfred Douglas had ever been issued.
His Lordship said the warrant had not issued. In answer to another question by the foreman, his lordship said the receipt of this letter
and the continuance of the intimacy was as damaging to the reputation of the recipient as to the sender,but that bad nothing to to do with this case. The
question was whether guilt had been brought home to the man in the dock. The jury retired at 3.30.
In answer to another question by the foreman his lordship said the receipt of this letters and the continuance of the intimacy was as
damaging to the reputation of the recipient as to the sender; but that had nothing to do with the case. The question was whether guilt had been brought
home to the man in the dock.