Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
Irish Daily Independent - Saturday, April 13, 1895
Irish Daily Independent - Saturday, April 13, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
Reynolds's Newspaper - Sunday, April 14, 1895
Reynolds's Newspaper - Sunday, April 14, 1895
Difference
The Paris correspondent of the "Daily Chronicle" says: — Yesterday a case of some topical interest came before he Eight Correctional
Tribunal. Mr Robert Sherrard, a journalist, had entered an action for criminal libel against Mc Carthy, of the British Consulate in Paris, who, it is
alleged, on sundry public occasions, accused the plaintiff of being not only an associate of the prisoner Oscar Wilde, but guilty of offences with which
the latter stands charged, Maitre Barzclay, counsel for the plaintiff, asked that the case might be heard at once, as the witnesses were obliged to leave
Paris for England. Maitre Bureau, the defendant’s counsel, made no objection, but President Lecouturier decided that in consequence of other cases it was
advisable to adjourn the proceedings until after the Easter recess, when the new judge on the roll would be able to deal with the evidence from beginning
to end. The court and precincts were crowded with English residents in Paris, the witnesses on both sides being numerous.
On Friday a case of some topical interest came before the eighth Correctional Tribunal at Paris. Mr. Robert Sherard, a journalist, had
entered an action for criminal libel against Mr. Macarthy, of the British Consulate in Paris, who it is alleged on sundry public occasions accused the
plaintiff of being not only an associate of the prisoner Oscar Wilde, but guilty of offences with which the latter stands charged. Maitre Barzelay,
counsel for the plaintiff, asked that the case might be heard at once, as the witnesses were obliged to leave Paris for England. Maitre Burean, the
defendant's counsel, made no objection, but President Lecouturier decided that in consequence of other cases it was advisable to adjourn the proceedings
until after the Easter recess, when the new Judge on the roll would be able to deal with the evidence from beginning to end. The court and precincts were
crowded with English residents in Paris, the witnesses on both sides being numerous.