Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
Irish Daily Independent - Monday, May 27, 1895
Irish Daily Independent - Monday, May 27, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
Flag of Ireland - Saturday, June 1, 1895
Flag of Ireland - Saturday, June 1, 1895
Difference
Lord Alfred Douglas, writing from Rouen in reference to the fracas which occurred between his father, the Marquis of Queensberry, and
Lord Douglas of Hawick, otherwise Lord Percy Sholto Douglas, states that the latter, both personally and through his solicitor, having frequently begged
the Marquis to cease writing letters containing objectionable language to Lord Douglas and his wife, and having received no more satisfactory answer from
Lord Queensberry than a challenge to light to a finish for £1,000 a side, was reluctantly compelled to apply to Mr Hannay for a summons against Lord
Queensberry in order to have him bound over. Mr Hannay refused the application, saying he declined to have any more dirty linen washed in this court. Lord
Queensberry continued his annoyances, and the second application was made to Mr Hannay, who, after consultation with Mr Newton, still refused a summons.
At last the annoyance became intolerable, and Lord Douglas was reduced to the absolute necessity of adopting the course he did of publicly assaulting Lord
Queensberry. The writer proceeds to critice adversely the action of Mr Hannay in refusing the summons, and asks, referring to the cheering in the streets,
for which of his feats Lord Queensberry seems to be rapidly taking the place of the great Duke of Wellington in the hearts of the British public?
Lord Alfred Douglas, writing from Rouen in reference to the fracas which occurred between his father, the Marquis of Queensbery, and
Lord Douglas of Hawick, otherwise Lord Percy Sholts Douglas, states that the latter, both personally and through his solicitor, having frequently begged
the Marquis to cease writing letters containing objectionable language to Lord Douglas and his wife, and having received no more satisfactory answer from
Lord Queensbery than the challenge to fight to the finish for £1,000 aside, was reluctantly compelled to apply to Mr Hannay for a summons against Lord
Queensbery in order to have him bound over. Mr Hannay refused the application, saying he declined to have any more dirty linen washed in his court. Lord
Queensbery continued his annoyances, and a second application was made to Mr Hannay, who, after consultation, still refused a summons. At last the
annoyance become intolerable, and Lord Douglas was reduced to the absolute necessity of adopting the course he did, of publicly assaulting Lord
Queensbery. The writer proceeds to criticise adversely the action of Mr Hannay in refusing a summons, and adds, referring to the cheering in the street,
for such feats Lord Queensbery seems to be rapidly taking the place of the great Duke of Wellington in the hearts of the British public.