Compare Paragraphs

LONDON, WEDNESDAY.The Marquis of Queensberry surrendered to his bail to-day at the Central Criminal Court, indicted for publishing a defamatory libel on Oscar Wilde, by addressing to him a card at the Albemarle Club. There was a crowded attendance of the public. On taking his place in the dock Lord Queensberry answered the indictment by pleading first "not guilty," and, secondly, that the libel was true, and was published for the public benefit.

Sir E CLARKE, in opening for the prosecution, said very grave issues had been raised because the defendant, in his pleadings, alleged that the plaintiff had for some time solicited persons named to commit indecent offences. Certain letters addressed by the plaintiff to Lord A. Douglas were brought to him by a man who said he was in distress, and Mr. Wilde gave him £15 or £20 to pay his passage to America. Another letter came to plaintiff, through Mr. Tree, the actor. It was handed to that gentleman, who, in turn, gave it to plaintiff. It was couched in extravagant terms, but it did not bear the suggestion made in this case. Coming to Lord Queensberry’s actions, the learned counsel said the jury might have doubts whether the defendant was responsible for his actions.

The plaintiff was examined by Sir EDWARD CLARKE at length on the subject of letters which he did not regard as important. He described a stormy interview in his own house with Lord Queensberry, who accused him of a nameless offence. He told defendant he did not know what the Queensberry rules were, but the Oscar Wilde rule was to shoot at sight. In ordering the defendant out of the house, he described him as the most infamous brute in London. There was no foundation for the suggestions in the pleadings.

Mr. CARSON cross-examined as to the teaching in "Dorian Gray" and "Phrases and Philosophies." The plaintiff replied that he looked at these matters from the point of view of art. The "Priest and Acolyte" was twaddle, but he had not disassociated himself from the "Cameleon," in which it appeared the man Wood was an unemployed clerk. Plaintiff said in further cross-examination he not only gave him £15 for his passage to America, but £5 more on the occasion of a champagne lunch before his departure. He denied misconducting himself with Wood. Lord A. Douglas had asked him to befriend the man when introducing him. Wood and plaintiff knew each other by their Christian names. A man named Allen also called on him with reference to the Douglas letters. He knew Allen as a blackmailer, and gave him 10s to show his contempt. (Laughter.) After Allen came another person named Clyburne, and he was kind to Clyburne by giving him the same amount. To a bookseller’s assistant he had given money on three occasions, but denied misconduct.

The Court adjourned.