Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Freeman’s Journal - Tuesday, April 23, 1895
The Freeman’s Journal - Tuesday, April 23, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
Dublin Daily Express - Tuesday, April 23, 1895
Dublin Daily Express - Tuesday, April 23, 1895
Difference
London, Monday.
The Recorder, Sir Charles Hall, in charging the grand jury at the Old Bailey to-day at the opening of the April Sessions, said there
was a serious charge against two men, Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor. He did not think it was necessary to allude to the facts of the case. It was only
necessary to say that after the grand jury had heard the evidence of the witnesses called before the magistrate they would no doubt feel it their duty to
return a true bill against each of the accused. The Recorder also directed a true bill to be returned against a man named Slater, charged with writing
libellous post cards charging Baron de Worms, M P, with being his father. The Recorder said that Slater's statements were ridiculous, as at the time he
was born Baron Henry de Worms was only four years old.
London, Monday.The Recorder, Sir Charles Hall, in charging the grand jury at the Old Bailey to-day at the opening of the April
Sessions, said there was a serious charge against two men, Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor. He did not think it necessary to allude to the facts of the
case. After the grand jury had heard the evidence of the witnesses called before the magistrate, they would, no doubt, feel it their duty to return a true
bill. The Recorder also directed a true bill to be returned against a man named Siater charged with writing libellous post cards cards charging Baron de
Worms, M P, with being his father. The Recorder said that Siater’s statements were ridiculous, as at the time he was born Baron Henry de Worms was only
four years old.