Compare Paragraphs
This page compares two reports at the paragraph level. The column on the left shows the first report in its entirety, and the column in the middle identifies paragraphs from the second report with significant matching content. The column on the right highlights any differences between the two matching paragraphs: pink shows differences in the first report and purple in the second report. The Match percentage underneath each comparison row in this column shows the percentage of similarity between the two paragraphs.
Original paragraph in
The Freeman’s Journal - Monday, April 29, 1895
The Freeman’s Journal - Monday, April 29, 1895
Most similar paragraph from
Dublin Daily Express - Monday, April 29, 1895
Dublin Daily Express - Monday, April 29, 1895
Difference
London, Saturday.
The trial of Oscar Wilde and Alfred Taylor was resumed at the Central Criminal Court to-day, before Mr Justice Charles. Sir Edward
Clarke cross-examined Alfred Wood, who was in the witness box at the time of the adjournment on Friday. Wood said he induced Wilde to give him money with
which to go to America, on the pretext that he wished to sever himself from certain acquaintances.
Notwithstanding this he returned to England. He received in all £175 from Allen. The letters mentioned in the Queensberry case were
found in clothes given him by Lord Alfred Douglas at Oxford.
Frederick Atkins, who accompanied Wilde to Paris, was the next witness called for the prosecution.
Atkins was subjected to a long and searching cross-examination. He denied that he and a fellow bookmaker's clerk named Burton had
blackmailed a Birmingham gentleman in June, 1891, at their rooms in Tachbrook street.
Replying to Mr Grain, Atkins said it was not true that either he or Burton obtained about this time last year £500 from a foreign
Count, whose yacht was lying off Scarborough. Witness was known in the betting ring as "Fed" and his friend Burton was called "Watson." While staying at
Gaze's Hotel, Nice, he and Burton did not quarrel and part, but there might have been a little row.
Sydney Mayor, who described himself as holding a partnership in the city, detailed the circumstances of his acquaintanceship with
Wilde, but denied all allegations.
Sidney Mavor, who described himself as holding a partnership in the city, detailed the circumstances of his acquaintanceship with Wilde.
He was followed in the witness box by the bookseller’s assistant, Edward Shelley, who appeared much distressed.
He was followed in the witness-box by the booksellers' assistant, Edward Shelly, who appeared much distressed by a compulsory recital
of Wilde's treatment of him at the Albemarble Hotel on two separate occasions.
Shelley was questioned by Sir Edward Clarke in cross-examination as to letters which he had addressed in 1894 to Wilde appealing to him
for assistance. His father had turned him out of his home, and he had resigned his position in the publishing office owing to his friendship with
prisoner. Shelly explained some expressions in these letters by saying his brain was disordered at the time he wrote.
Shelly was questioned by Sir Edward Clarke in cross-examination as to letters which he had addressed in 1894 to Wilde appealing to him
for assistance. His father had turned him out of his home, and he had resigned his position in the publishing office owing to his friendship with
prisoner. Shelly explained some expressions in these letters by saying his brain was disordered at the time he wrote.
At the request of Sir Edward Clarke Frederick Atkins was recalled, and his lordship having glanced at a document handed to him by the
learned counsel, cautioned Atkins to be careful how he answered the questions to he addressed to him. Atkins then admitted that in June, 1891, he took a
gentleman from the Alhambra to his rooms in Tachbrook street, and that he and Burton were afterwards arrested.
The case was adjourned until Monday,
The case was adjourned until to-day.